The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Q fever serology: cutoff determination for microimmunofluorescence
Open accessAbstract
Q fever, a worldwide zoonosis caused by Coxiella burnetii, lacks clinical specificity and may present as acute or chronic disease. Because of this polymorphism, serological confirmation is necessary to assess the diagnosis. Although microimmunofluorescence is our reference technique, the cutoff titers that are currently used to make a diagnosis of active or chronic Q fever were determined years ago with limited series of patients and sera. We determined the titers of immunoglobulin G (IgG), IgM, and IgA against both phases (I and II) of Coxiella burnetii. Rheumatoid factor was removed before testing IgM and IgA. We report here the various cutoff titers and the kinetics of antibody development from 2,218 first serum samples of patients, among whom 208 suffered from acute Q fever and 53 had chronic Q fever. In active Q fever, we have defined a low cutoff (phase II IgG titer < or = 100) below which the diagnosis cannot be made and would need further confirmation and confirmed a high cutoff (phase II IgG titer > or = 200 and phase II IgM titer > or = 50) over which the diagnosis can be made. For chronic Q fever diagnosis, phase I IgA titers are not contributive despite previous works claiming their usefulness; a phase I IgG titer of > or = 800 is highly predictive (98%) and sensitive (100%). We have also studied the possibility of rejecting or evoking the diagnosis of chronic Q fever by phase II IgG and IgA titers. This method is useful when phase I testing is not available, but the sensitivity remains low (57%).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Fournier, P.-E., Marrie, T. J., & Raoult, D. (1998) · Journal of Clinical Microbiology · doi:10.1128/jcm.36.7.1823-1834.1998 · Cited by 630
Self-citationFournier, P. E., Casalta, J. P., Habib, G., Messana, T., & Raoult, D. (1996) · The American Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1016/s0002-9343(96)00040-x · Cited by 220
Self-citationRepertoire of intensive care unit pneumonia microbiota
Bousbia, S., Papazian, L., Saux, P., Forel, J. M., Auffray, J.-P., Martin, C., Raoult, D., & La Scola, B. (2012) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0032486 · Cited by 118
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Dupont, H. T., Thirion, X., & Raoult, D.
- Venue
- Clinical Diagnostic Laboratory Immunology
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 1994-03
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 189-196
- ISSN
- 1071-412X (ISSN-L)
- 1098-6588
- OpenAlex
- W1774760650
- Cited by
- 339
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Q fever serology: cutoff determination for microimmunofluorescence. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/cdli.1.2.189-196.1994
- The paper
- Dupont, H. T., Thirion, X., & Raoult, D. (1994). Q fever serology: cutoff determination for microimmunofluorescence. Clinical Diagnostic Laboratory Immunology. https://doi.org/10.1128/cdli.1.2.189-196.1994
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.