The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Diagnosis of Ebola Virus Disease: Past, Present, and Future
Open accessAbstract
SUMMARY: Laboratory diagnosis of Ebola virus disease plays a critical role in outbreak response efforts; however, establishing safe and expeditious testing strategies for this high-biosafety-level pathogen in resource-poor environments remains extremely challenging. Since the discovery of Ebola virus in 1976 via traditional viral culture techniques and electron microscopy, diagnostic methodologies have trended toward faster, more accurate molecular assays. Importantly, technological advances have been paired with increasing efforts to support decentralized diagnostic testing capacity that can be deployed at or near the point of patient care. The unprecedented scope of the 2014-2015 West Africa Ebola epidemic spurred tremendous innovation in this arena, and a variety of new diagnostic platforms that have the potential both to immediately improve ongoing surveillance efforts in West Africa and to transform future outbreak responses have reached the field. In this review, we describe the evolution of Ebola virus disease diagnostic testing and efforts to deploy field diagnostic laboratories in prior outbreaks. We then explore the diagnostic challenges pervading the 2014-2015 epidemic and provide a comprehensive examination of novel diagnostic tests that are likely to address some of these challenges moving forward.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Emergence of Zaire Ebola Virus Disease in Guinea
Baize, S., Pannetier, D., Oestereich, L., Rieger, T., Koivogui, L., Magassouba, N., Soropogui, B., Sow, M. S., Keïta, S., De Clerck, H., et al. (2014) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1404505 · Cited by 1,366
Cited by
Point-of-Care Diagnostics: Recent Developments in a Connected Age
Nayak, S., Blumenfeld, N. R., Laksanasopin, T., & Sia, S. K. (2017) · Analytical Chemistry · doi:10.1021/acs.analchem.6b04630 · Cited by 508
Access to pathology and laboratory medicine services: a crucial gap
Wilson, M. L., Fleming, K. A., Kuti, M. A., Looi, L. M., Lago, N., & Ru, K. (2018) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(18)30458-6 · Cited by 444
Next-generation diagnostics with CRISPR
Chertow, D. S. (2018) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aat4982 · Cited by 365
Metadata
- Authors
- Broadhurst, M. J., Brooks, T. J. G., & Pollock, N. R.
- Venue
- Clinical Microbiology Reviews
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 2016-10
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 773-793
- ISSN
- 0893-8512 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-6618
- OpenAlex
- W2472341110
- Cited by
- 222
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 18.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Diagnosis of Ebola Virus Disease: Past, Present, and Future. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/cmr.00003-16
- The paper
- Broadhurst, M. J., Brooks, T. J. G., & Pollock, N. R. (2016). Diagnosis of Ebola Virus Disease: Past, Present, and Future. Clinical Microbiology Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1128/cmr.00003-16
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.