The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
From Clinical Microbiology to Infection Pathogenesis: How Daring To Be Different Works for Staphylococcus lugdunensis
Open accessAbstract
SUMMARY: Staphylococcus lugdunensis has gained recognition as an atypically virulent pathogen with a unique microbiological and clinical profile.S. lugdunensis is coagulase negative due to the lack of production of secreted coagulase, but a membrane-bound form of the enzyme present in some isolates can result in misidentification of the organism as Staphylococcus aureus in the clinical microbiology laboratory.S. lugdunensis is a skin commensal and an infrequent pathogen compared to S. aureus and S. epidermidis, but clinically, infections caused by this organism resemble those caused by S. aureus rather than those caused by other coagulase-negative staphylococci.S. lugdunensis can cause acute and highly destructive cases of native valve endocarditis that often require surgical treatment in addition to antimicrobial therapy. Other types of S. lugdunensis infections include abscess and wound infection, urinary tract infection, and infection of intravascular catheters and other implanted medical devices.S. lugdunensis is generally susceptible to antimicrobial agents and shares CLSI antimicrobial susceptibility breakpoints with S. aureus. Virulence factors contributing to this organism's heightened pathogenicity remain largely unknown. Those characterized to date suggest that the organism has the ability to bind to and interact with host cells and to form biofilms on host tissues or prosthetic surfaces.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Enzymatic Detachment of Staphylococcus epidermidis Biofilms
Kaplan, J. B., Ragunath, C., Velliyagounder, K., Fine, D. H., & Ramasubbu, N. (2004) · Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy · doi:10.1128/aac.48.7.2633-2636.2004 · Cited by 332
Anguera, I., Del Río, A., Miró, J. M., Matínez-Lacasa, X., Marco, F., Gumá, J. R., Quaglio, G., Claramonte, X., Moreno, A., Mestres, C. A., et al. (2005) · Heart · doi:10.1136/hrt.2004.040659 · Cited by 202
Cited by
Coagulase-Negative Staphylococci
Becker, K., Heilmann, C., & Peters, G. (2014) · Clinical Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1128/cmr.00109-13 · Cited by 1,628
Peptide Signaling in the Staphylococci
Thoendel, M., Kavanaugh, J. S., Flack, C. E., & Horswill, A. R. (2011) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr100370n · Cited by 438
Coagulase-Negative Staphylococcal Infections
Rogers, K. L., Fey, P. D., & Rupp, M. E. (2009) · Infectious Disease Clinics of North America · doi:10.1016/j.idc.2008.10.001 · Cited by 401
Iron-Regulated Surface Determinant (Isd) Proteins of Staphylococcus lugdunensis
Zapotoczna, M., Heilbronner, S., Speziale, P., & Foster, T. J. (2012) · Journal of Bacteriology · doi:10.1128/jb.01195-12 · Cited by 56
Staphylococcus lugdunensis IsdG Liberates Iron from Host Heme
Haley, K. P., Janson, E. M., Heilbronner, S., Foster, T. J., & Skaar, E. P. (2011) · Journal of Bacteriology · doi:10.1128/jb.00436-11 · Cited by 53
Metadata
- Authors
- Frank, K. L., del Pozo, J. L., & Patel, R.
- Venue
- Clinical Microbiology Reviews
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 2008-01
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 111-133
- ISSN
- 0893-8512 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-6618
- OpenAlex
- W2116149718
- Cited by
- 327
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 11.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: From Clinical Microbiology to Infection Pathogenesis: How Daring To Be Different Works for Staphylococcus lugdunensis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/cmr.00036-07
- The paper
- Frank, K. L., del Pozo, J. L., & Patel, R. (2008). From Clinical Microbiology to Infection Pathogenesis: How Daring To Be Different Works for Staphylococcus lugdunensis. Clinical Microbiology Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1128/cmr.00036-07
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.