The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Microbiology of Animal Bite Wound Infections
Open accessAbstract
SUMMARY: The microbiology of animal bite wound infections in humans is often polymicrobial, with a broad mixture of aerobic and anaerobic microorganisms. Bacteria recovered from infected bite wounds are most often reflective of the oral flora of the biting animal, which can also be influenced by the microbiome of their ingested prey and other foods. Bacteria may also originate from the victim's own skin or the physical environment at the time of injury. Our review has focused on bite wound infections in humans from dogs, cats, and a variety of other animals such as monkeys, bears, pigs, ferrets, horses, sheep, Tasmanian devils, snakes, Komodo dragons, monitor lizards, iguanas, alligators/crocodiles, rats, guinea pigs, hamsters, prairie dogs, swans, and sharks. The medical literature in this area has been made up mostly of small case series or case reports. Very few studies have been systematic and are often limited to dog or cat bite injuries. Limitations of studies include a lack of established or inconsistent criteria for an infected wound and a failure to utilize optimal techniques in pathogen isolation, especially for anaerobic organisms. There is also a lack of an understanding of the pathogenic significance of all cultured organisms. Gathering information and conducting research in a more systematic and methodical fashion through an organized research network, including zoos, veterinary practices, and rural clinics and hospitals, are needed to better define the microbiology of animal bite wound infections in humans.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Bacteriologic analysis of infected dog and cat bites
Talan, D. A., Citron, D. M., Abrahamian, F. M., Moran, G. J., & Goldstein, E. J. C. (1999) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199901143400202 · Cited by 941
Self-citationPrete, R. D., Fumarola, D., Fumarola, L., Basile, V., Mosca, A., & Miragliotta, G. (1999) · European Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1023/a:1007558724492 · Cited by 16
Cited by
Animals in Healthcare Facilities: Recommendations to Minimize Potential Risks
Murthy, R., Bearman, G., Brown, S., Bryant, K., Chinn, R., Hewlett, A., George, B. G., Goldstein, E. J. C., Holzmann-Pazgal, G., Rupp, M. E., et al. (2015) · Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology · doi:10.1017/ice.2015.15 · Cited by 142
Self-citationScoping decades of dog evidence: a scoping review of dog bite-related sequelae
Dhillon, J., Hoopes, J., & Epp, T. (2019) · Canadian Journal of Public Health · doi:10.17269/s41997-018-0145-3 · Cited by 38
Metadata
- Authors
- Abrahamian, F. M., & Goldstein, E. J. C.
- Venue
- Clinical Microbiology Reviews
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 2011-04
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 231-246
- ISSN
- 0893-8512 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-6618
- OpenAlex
- W2137892645
- Cited by
- 434
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 7.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Microbiology of Animal Bite Wound Infections. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/cmr.00041-10
- The paper
- Abrahamian, F. M., & Goldstein, E. J. C. (2011). Microbiology of Animal Bite Wound Infections. Clinical Microbiology Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1128/cmr.00041-10
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.