Cited by 208Xenotransplantation and immune responseAnimal Genetics and ReproductionHIV Research and Treatment

Infection Barriers to Successful Xenotransplantation Focusing on Porcine Endogenous Retroviruses

Open access
Denner, Joachim, Tönjes, Ralf R.·2012·Clinical Microbiology Reviews

Abstract

SUMMARY: Xenotransplantation may be a solution to overcome the shortage of organs for the treatment of patients with organ failure, but it may be associated with the transmission of porcine microorganisms and the development of xenozoonoses. Whereas most microorganisms may be eliminated by pathogen-free breeding of the donor animals, porcine endogenous retroviruses (PERVs) cannot be eliminated, since these are integrated into the genomes of all pigs. Human-tropic PERV-A and -B are present in all pigs and are able to infect human cells. Infection of ecotropic PERV-C is limited to pig cells. PERVs may adapt to host cells by varying the number of LTR-binding transcription factor binding sites. Like all retroviruses, they may induce tumors and/or immunodeficiencies. To date, all experimental, preclinical, and clinical xenotransplantations using pig cells, tissues, and organs have not shown transmission of PERV. Highly sensitive and specific methods have been developed to analyze the PERV status of donor pigs and to monitor recipients for PERV infection. Strategies have been developed to prevent PERV transmission, including selection of PERV-C-negative, low-producer pigs, generation of an effective vaccine, selection of effective antiretrovirals, and generation of animals transgenic for a PERV-specific short hairpin RNA inhibiting PERV expression by RNA interference.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1128/cmr.05011-11

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 369 · Cited by 208

Authors
Denner, J., & Tönjes, R. R.
Affiliations
  • Robert Koch Institute (DE)
  • Paul Ehrlich Institut (DE)
Venue
Clinical Microbiology Reviews
Published
2012-04
Volume
25
Issue
2
Pages
318-343
ISSN
  • 0893-8512 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-6618
OpenAlex
W2125570295
Cited by
208
References
369
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 3
FWCI
2.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Clinical Microbiology Reviews (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Publication server of the Robert Koch Institute (Robert Kock Institute) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Xenotransplantation and immune response
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Animal Genetics and Reproduction
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Virology › HIV Research and Treatment
Keywords
xenotransplantation, porcine endogenous retroviruses, xenozoonoses, PERV-A, PERV-B, PERV-C, retroviral oncogenesis, immunodeficiency, antiretroviral therapy, shRNA, transgenic pigs, xenotransplantation barriers
MeSH terms
Animals, Humans, Retroviridae Infections, Swine, Transplantation, Heterologous, Endogenous Retroviruses, Animals, Genetically Modified

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review