The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Molecular Techniques for Detection, Species Differentiation, and Phylogenetic Analysis of Microsporidia
Open accessAbstract
SUMMARY: Microsporidia are obligate intracellular protozoan parasites that infect a broad range of vertebrates and invertebrates. These parasites are now recognized as one of the most common pathogens in human immunodeficiency virus-infected patients. For most patients with infectious diseases, microbiological isolation and identification techniques offer the most rapid and specific determination of the etiologic agent. This is not a suitable procedure for microsporidia, which are obligate intracellular parasites requiring cell culture systems for growth. Therefore, the diagnosis of microsporidiosis currently depends on morphological demonstration of the organisms themselves. Although the diagnosis of microsporidiosis and identification of microsporidia by light microscopy have greatly improved during the last few years, species differentiation by these techniques is usually impossible and transmission electron microscopy may be necessary. Immunfluorescent-staining techniques have been developed for species differentiation of microsporidia, but the antibodies used in these procedures are available only at research laboratories at present. During the last 10 years, the detection of infectious disease agents has begun to include the use of nucleic acid-based technologies. Diagnosis of infection caused by parasitic organisms is the last field of clinical microbiology to incorporate these techniques and molecular techniques (e.g., PCR and hybridization assays) have recently been developed for the detection, species differentiation, and phylogenetic analysis of microsporidia. In this paper we review human microsporidial infections and describe and discuss these newly developed molecular techniques.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Woese, C. R. (1987) · Microbiological Reviews · doi:10.1128/mr.51.2.221-271.1987 · Cited by 5,042
Antiprotozoal activities of benzimidazoles and correlations with beta-tubulin sequence
Katiyar, S. K., Gordon, V. R., McLaughlin, G. L., & Edlind, T. D. (1994) · Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy · doi:10.1128/aac.38.9.2086 · Cited by 217
Cited by
Microsporidia and ‘The Art of Living Together’
Vávra, J., & Lukeš, J. (2013) · Advances in Parasitology · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-407706-5.00004-6 · Cited by 279
Albendazole Therapy for Microsporidium Diarrhea in Immunocompetent Costa Rican Children
Tremoulet, A. H., Avila-Aguero, M. L., París, M. M., Canas-Coto, A., Ulloa-Gutierrez, R., & Faingezicht, I. (2004) · Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal · doi:10.1097/01.inf.0000141724.06556.f9 · Cited by 42
Metadata
- Authors
- Franzen, C., & Müller, A.
- Venue
- Clinical Microbiology Reviews
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 1999-04
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 243-285
- ISSN
- 0893-8512 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-6618
- OpenAlex
- W2131574082
- Cited by
- 262
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 8.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Molecular Techniques for Detection, Species Differentiation, and Phylogenetic Analysis of Microsporidia. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/cmr.12.2.243
- The paper
- Franzen, C., & Müller, A. (1999). Molecular Techniques for Detection, Species Differentiation, and Phylogenetic Analysis of Microsporidia. Clinical Microbiology Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1128/cmr.12.2.243
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.