The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Laboratory-Acquired Parasitic Infections from Accidental Exposures
Open accessAbstract
SUMMARY: Parasitic diseases are receiving increasing attention in developed countries in part because of their importance in travelers, immigrants, and immunocompromised persons. The main purpose of this review is to educate laboratorians, the primary readership, and health care workers, the secondary readership, about the potential hazards of handling specimens that contain viable parasites and about the diseases that can result. This is accomplished partly through discussion of the occupationally acquired cases of parasitic infections that have been reported, focusing for each case on the type of accident that resulted in infection, the length of the incubation period, the clinical manifestations that developed, and the means by which infection was detected. The article focuses on the cases of infection with the protozoa that cause leishmaniasis, malaria, toxoplasmosis, Chagas' disease (American trypanosomiasis), and African trypanosomiasis. Data about 164 such cases are discussed, as are data about cases caused by intestinal protozoa and by helminths. Of the 105 case-patients infected with blood and tissue protozoa who either recalled an accident or for whom the likely route of transmission could be presumed, 47 (44.8%) had percutaneous exposure via a contaminated needle or other sharp object. Some accidents were directly linked to poor laboratory practices (e.g., recapping a needle or working barehanded). To decrease the likelihood of accidental exposures, persons who could be exposed to pathogenic parasites must be thoroughly instructed in safety precautions before they begin to work and through ongoing training programs. Protocols should be provided for handling specimens that could contain viable organisms, using protective clothing and equipment, dealing with spills of infectious organisms, and responding to accidents. Special care should be exercised when using needles and other sharp objects.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Burza, S., Croft, S. L., & Boelaert, M. (2018) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(18)31204-2 · Cited by 1,913
Pérez-Molina, J. A., & Molina, I. (2018) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(17)31612-4 · Cited by 1,284
Epidemiology of human African trypanosomiasis
Simarro, P., Franco, J., Diarra, A., & Jannin, J. (2014) · Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.2147/clep.s39728 · Cited by 416
Nunes, M. C. P., Dones, W., Morillo, C. A., Encina, J. J., & Ribeiro, A. L. (2013) · Journal of the American College of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2013.05.046 · Cited by 386
Chagas Disease in the United States: a Public Health Approach
Bern, C., Messenger, L. A., Whitman, J. D., & Maguire, J. H. (2019) · Clinical Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1128/cmr.00023-19 · Cited by 282
Metadata
- Authors
- Herwaldt, B. L.
- Venue
- Clinical Microbiology Reviews
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 2001-10
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 659-688
- ISSN
- 0893-8512 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-6618
- OpenAlex
- W2152153749
- Cited by
- 249
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.32
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Laboratory-Acquired Parasitic Infections from Accidental Exposures. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/cmr.14.3.659-688.2001
- The paper
- Herwaldt, B. L. (2001). Laboratory-Acquired Parasitic Infections from Accidental Exposures. Clinical Microbiology Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1128/cmr.14.3.659-688.2001
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.