The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Clinical and Taxonomic Status of Pathogenic Nonpigmented or Late-Pigmenting Rapidly Growing Mycobacteria
Open accessAbstract
SUMMARY: The history, taxonomy, geographic distribution, clinical disease, and therapy of the pathogenic nonpigmented or late-pigmenting rapidly growing mycobacteria (RGM) are reviewed. Community-acquired disease and health care-associated disease are highlighted for each species. The latter grouping includes health care-associated outbreaks and pseudo-outbreaks as well as sporadic disease cases. Treatment recommendations for each species and type of disease are also described. Special emphasis is on the Mycobacterium fortuitum group, including M. fortuitum, M. peregrinum, and the unnamed third biovariant complex with its recent taxonomic changes and newly recognized species (including M. septicum, M. mageritense, and proposed species M. houstonense and M. bonickei). The clinical and taxonomic status of M. chelonae, M. abscessus, and M. mucogenicum is also detailed, along with that of the closely related new species, M. immunogenum. Additionally, newly recognized species, M. wolinskyi and M. goodii, as well as M. smegmatis sensu stricto, are included in a discussion of the M. smegmatis group. Laboratory diagnosis of RGM using phenotypic methods such as biochemical testing and high-performance liquid chromatography and molecular methods of diagnosis are also discussed. The latter includes PCR-restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis, hybridization, ribotyping, and sequence analysis. Susceptibility testing and antibiotic susceptibility patterns of the RGM are also annotated, along with the current recommendations from the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards (NCCLS) for mycobacterial susceptibility testing.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Non-tuberculous mycobacteria and the rise of Mycobacterium abscessus
Johansen, M. D., Herrmann, J.-L., & Kremer, L. (2020) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/s41579-020-0331-1 · Cited by 822
Floto, R. A., Olivier, K. N., Saiman, L., Daley, C. L., Herrmann, J.-L., Nick, J. A., Noone, P. G., Bilton, D., Corris, P., Gibson, R. L., et al. (2016) · Thorax · doi:10.1136/thoraxjnl-2015-207360 · Cited by 466
Self-citationFloto, R. A., Olivier, K. N., Saiman, L., Daley, C. L., Herrmann, J.-L., Nick, J. A., Noone, P. G., Bilton, D., Corris, P., Gibson, R. L., et al. (2016) · Thorax · doi:10.1136/thoraxjnl-2015-207983 · Cited by 462
Self-citationMicrobiological Features and Clinical Relevance of New Species of the Genus Mycobacterium
Tortoli, E. (2014) · Clinical Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1128/cmr.00035-14 · Cited by 355
Hurst-Hess, K., Rudra, P., & Ghosh, P. (2017) · Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy · doi:10.1128/aac.01347-17 · Cited by 115
Metadata
- Authors
- Brown-Elliott, B. A., & Wallace, R. J.
- Venue
- Clinical Microbiology Reviews
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 2002-10
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 716-746
- ISSN
- 0893-8512 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-6618
- OpenAlex
- W2144048071
- Cited by
- 909
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 13.78
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Clinical and Taxonomic Status of Pathogenic Nonpigmented or Late-Pigmenting Rapidly Growing Mycobacteria. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/cmr.15.4.716-746.2002
- The paper
- Brown-Elliott, B. A., & Wallace, R. J. (2002). Clinical and Taxonomic Status of Pathogenic Nonpigmented or Late-Pigmenting Rapidly Growing Mycobacteria. Clinical Microbiology Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1128/cmr.15.4.716-746.2002
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.