The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Ehrlichia chaffeensis:a Prototypical Emerging Pathogen
Open accessAbstract
SUMMARY: Ehrlichia chaffeensis is an obligately intracellular, tick-transmitted bacterium that is maintained in nature in a cycle involving at least one and perhaps several vertebrate reservoir hosts. The moderate to severe disease caused by E. chaffeensis in humans, first identified in 1986 and reported for more than 1,000 patients through 2000, represents a prototypical “emerging infection.” Knowledge of the biology and natural history of E. chaffeensis, and of the epidemiology, clinical features, and laboratory diagnosis of the zoonotic disease it causes (commonly referred to as human monocytic ehrlichiosis [HME]) has expanded considerably in the period since its discovery. In this review, we summarize briefly the current understanding of the microbiology, pathogenesis, and clinical manifestations associated with this pathogen but focus primarily on discussing various ecological factors responsible for the recent recognition of this important and potentially life-threatening tick-borne disease. Perhaps the most pivotal element in the emergence of HME has been the staggering increases in white-tailed deer populations in the eastern United States during the 20th century. This animal serves as a keystone host for all life stages of the principal tick vector (Amblyomma americanum) and is perhaps the most important vertebrate reservoir host for E. chaffeensis. The contributions of other components, including expansion of susceptible human populations, growth and broadening geographical distributions of other potential reservoir species and A. americanum, and improvements in confirmatory diagnostic methods, are also explored.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Biggs, H. M., Behravesh, C. B., Bradley, K. K., Dahlgren, F. S., Drexler, N. A., Dumler, J. S., Folk, S. M., Kato, C. Y., Lash, R. R., Levin, M. L., et al. (2016) · MMWR. Recommendations and Reports · doi:10.15585/mmwr.rr6502a1 · Cited by 667
Self-citationMadison-Antenucci, S., Kramer, L. D., Gebhardt, L. L., & Kauffman, E. (2020) · Clinical Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1128/cmr.00083-18 · Cited by 586
Scrub typhus and tropical rickettsioses
Watt, G., & Parola, P. (2003) · Current Opinion in Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1097/00001432-200310000-00009 · Cited by 465
Climatic changes and their role in emergence and re-emergence of diseases
El-Sayed, A., & Kamel, M. (2020) · Environmental Science and Pollution Research · doi:10.1007/s11356-020-08896-w · Cited by 441
Human Infection with Ehrlichia Canis Accompanied by Clinical Signs in Venezuela
PEREZ, M., BODOR, M., ZHANG, C., XIONG, Q., & RIKIHISA, Y. (2006) · Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1196/annals.1374.016 · Cited by 337
Metadata
- Authors
- Paddock, C. D., & Childs, J. E.
- Venue
- Clinical Microbiology Reviews
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 2003-01
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 37-64
- ISSN
- 0893-8512 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-6618
- OpenAlex
- W2120295864
- Cited by
- 513
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 14.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Ehrlichia chaffeensis:a Prototypical Emerging Pathogen. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/cmr.16.1.37-64.2003
- The paper
- Paddock, C. D., & Childs, J. E. (2003). Ehrlichia chaffeensis:a Prototypical Emerging Pathogen. Clinical Microbiology Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1128/cmr.16.1.37-64.2003
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.