The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The dermatophytes
Open accessAbstract
The etiologic agents of the dermatophytoses (ringworm) are classified in three anamorphic (asexual or imperfect) genera, Epidermophyton, Microsporum, and Trichophyton. Species capable of reproducing sexually belong in the teleomorphic genus, Arthroderma, of the Ascomycota. On the basis of primary habitat association, they may be grouped as geophilic (soil associated), zoophilic, and anthropophilic. Adaptation to growth on humans by most geophilic species resulted in diminished loss of sporulation, sexuality, and other soil-associated characteristics. The dermatophytes have the ability to invade keratinized tissue (skin, hair, and nails) but are usually restricted to the nonliving cornified layer of the epidermis because of their inability to penetrate viable tissue of an immunocompetent host. However, invasion does elicit a host response ranging from mild to severe. Acid proteinases, elastase, keratinases, and other proteinases reportedly act as virulence factors. The development of cell-mediated immunity correlated with delayed hypersensitivity and an inflammatory response is associated with clinical cure, whereas the lack of or a defective cell-mediated immunity predisposes the host to chronic or recurrent dermatophyte infection. Chronic dermatophytosis is mostly caused by Trichophyton rubrum, and there is some evidence that mannan produced by this fungus suppresses or diminishes the inflammatory response. Since dermatophytes cause a communicable disease, modes of transmission and control are discussed as well as a survey of recent trends in therapy. Collection of specimens, culture media, and tests for identification are also presented. Genetic studies have led to an understanding of incompatibility mechanisms, pleomorphism and variation, resistance to griseofulvin, and virulence. Molecular biology has contributed to our knowledge of the taxonomy and phylogenetic relationships of dermatophytes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The Still Underestimated Problem of Fungal Diseases Worldwide
Almeida, F., Rodrigues, M. L., & Coelho, C. (2019) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2019.00214 · Cited by 445
The Spectrum of Fungi That Infects Humans
Kohler, J. R., Casadevall, A., & Perfect, J. (2015) · Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Medicine · doi:10.1101/cshperspect.a019273 · Cited by 364
Management of tinea corporis, tinea cruris, and tinea pedis: A comprehensive review
Mahajan, R., & Sahoo, A. (2016) · Indian Dermatology Online Journal · doi:10.4103/2229-5178.178099 · Cited by 363
Irinyi, L., Serena, C., Garcia-Hermoso, D., Arabatzis, M., Desnos-Ollivier, M., Vu, D., Cardinali, G., Arthur, I., Normand, A.-C., Giraldo, A., et al. (2015) · Medical Mycology · doi:10.1093/mmy/myv008 · Cited by 329
Antimicrobial effect of resveratrol on dermatophytes and bacterial pathogens of the skin
Chan, M. M.-Y. (2002) · Biochemical Pharmacology · doi:10.1016/s0006-2952(01)00886-3 · Cited by 287
Metadata
- Authors
- Weitzman, I., & Summerbell, R. C.
- Venue
- Clinical Microbiology Reviews
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 1995-04
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 240-259
- ISSN
- 0893-8512 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-6618
- OpenAlex
- W4211087045
- Cited by
- 966
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.62
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The dermatophytes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/cmr.8.2.240
- The paper
- Weitzman, I., & Summerbell, R. C. (1995). The dermatophytes. Clinical Microbiology Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1128/cmr.8.2.240
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.