Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 172

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Multisite Comparison of High-Sensitivity Multiplex Cytokine Assays

Open access
Breen, Elizabeth Crabb, Reynolds, Sandra M., Cox, Christopher, Jacobson, Lisa P., Magpantay, Larry, Mulder, Candice B., Dibben, Oliver, Margolick, Joseph B., Bream, Jay H., Sambrano, Elise, Martínez-Maza, Otoniel, Sinclair, Elizabeth, Borrow, Persephone, Landay, Alan L., Rinaldo, Charles R., Norris, Philip J.·2011·Clinical and Vaccine Immunology

Abstract

The concentrations of cytokines in human serum and plasma can provide valuable information about in vivo immune status, but low concentrations often require high-sensitivity assays to permit detection. The recent development of multiplex assays, which can measure multiple cytokines in one small sample, holds great promise, especially for studies in which limited volumes of stored serum or plasma are available. Four high-sensitivity cytokine multiplex assays on a Luminex (Bio-Rad, BioSource, Linco) or electrochemiluminescence (Meso Scale Discovery) platform were evaluated for their ability to detect circulating concentrations of 13 cytokines, as well as for laboratory and lot variability. Assays were performed in six different laboratories utilizing archived serum from HIV-uninfected and -infected subjects from the Multicenter AIDS Cohort Study (MACS) and the Women's Interagency HIV Study (WIHS) and commercial plasma samples spanning initial HIV viremia. In a majority of serum samples, interleukin-6 (IL-6), IL-8, IL-10, and tumor necrosis factor alpha were detectable with at least three kits, while IL-1β was clearly detected with only one kit. No single multiplex panel detected all cytokines, and there were highly significant differences ( P < 0.001) between laboratories and/or lots with all kits. Nevertheless, the kits generally detected similar patterns of cytokine perturbation during primary HIV viremia. This multisite comparison suggests that current multiplex assays vary in their ability to measure serum and/or plasma concentrations of cytokines and may not be sufficiently reproducible for repeated determinations over a long-term study or in multiple laboratories but may be useful for longitudinal studies in which relative, rather than absolute, changes in cytokines are important.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1128/cvi.05032-11

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 172

Metadata

Authors
Breen, E. C., Reynolds, S. M., Cox, C., Jacobson, L. P., Magpantay, L., Mulder, C. B., Dibben, O., Margolick, J. B., Bream, J. H., Sambrano, E., Martínez-Maza, O., Sinclair, E., Borrow, P., Landay, A. L., Rinaldo, C. R., & Norris, P. J.
Venue
Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
Published
2011-08
Volume
18
Issue
8
Pages
1229-1242
ISSN
  • 1556-679X (ISSN-L)
  • 1556-6811
OpenAlex
W2110049985
Cited by
172
References
1
FWCI
5.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
diamond

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Multisite Comparison of High-Sensitivity Multiplex Cytokine Assays. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/cvi.05032-11
The paper
Breen, E. C., Reynolds, S. M., Cox, C., Jacobson, L. P., Magpantay, L., Mulder, C. B., Dibben, O., Margolick, J. B., Bream, J. H., Sambrano, E., Martínez-Maza, O., Sinclair, E., Borrow, P., Landay, A. L., Rinaldo, C. R., & Norris, P. J. (2011). Multisite Comparison of High-Sensitivity Multiplex Cytokine Assays. Clinical and Vaccine Immunology. https://doi.org/10.1128/cvi.05032-11

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.