Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 307

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Molecular Phylogenetics of Candida albicans

Open access
Odds, Frank C., Bougnoux, Marie-Elisabeth, Shaw, Duncan J., Bain, Judith M., Davidson, Amanda D., Diogo, Dorothée, Jacobsen, Mette D., Lecomte, Maud, Li, Shu-Ying, Tavanti, Arianna, Maiden, Martin C. J., Gow, Neil A. R., d'Enfert, Christophe·2007·Eukaryotic Cell

Abstract

We analyzed data on multilocus sequence typing (MLST), ABC typing, mating type-like locus ( MAT ) status, and antifungal susceptibility for a panel of 1,391 Candida albicans isolates. Almost all (96.7%) of the isolates could be assigned by MLST to one of 17 clades. eBURST analysis revealed 53 clonal clusters. Diploid sequence type 69 was the most common MLST strain type and the founder of the largest clonal cluster, and examples were found among isolates from all parts of the world. ABC types and geographical origins showed statistically significant variations among clades by univariate analysis of variance, but anatomical source and antifungal susceptibility data were not significantly associated. A separate analysis limited to European isolates, thereby minimizing geographical effects, showed significant differences in the proportions of isolates from blood, commensal carriage, and superficial infections among the five most populous clades. The proportion of isolates with low antifungal susceptibility was highest for MAT homozygous a / a types and then α/α types and was lowest for heterozygous a /α types. The tree of clades defined by MLST was not congruent with trees generated from the individual gene fragments sequenced, implying a separate evolutionary history for each fragment. Analysis of nucleic acid variation among loci and within loci supported recombination. Computational haplotype analysis showed a high frequency of recombination events, suggesting that isolates had mixed evolutionary histories resembling those of a sexually reproducing species.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1128/ec.00041-07

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Cited by

See all 307

Metadata

Authors
Odds, F. C., Bougnoux, M.-E., Shaw, D. J., Bain, J. M., Davidson, A. D., Diogo, D., Jacobsen, M. D., Lecomte, M., Li, S.-Y., Tavanti, A., Maiden, M. C. J., Gow, N. A. R., & d'Enfert, C.
Venue
Eukaryotic Cell
Published
2007-06
Volume
6
Issue
6
Pages
1041-1052
ISSN
  • 1535-9778 (ISSN-L)
  • 1535-9786
OpenAlex
W2168705804
Cited by
307
References
4
FWCI
13.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
diamond

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Molecular Phylogenetics of Candida albicans. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/ec.00041-07
The paper
Odds, F. C., Bougnoux, M.-E., Shaw, D. J., Bain, J. M., Davidson, A. D., Diogo, D., Jacobsen, M. D., Lecomte, M., Li, S.-Y., Tavanti, A., Maiden, M. C. J., Gow, N. A. R., & d'Enfert, C. (2007). Molecular Phylogenetics of Candida albicans. Eukaryotic Cell. https://doi.org/10.1128/ec.00041-07

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.