Immune evasion, stress resistance, and efficient nutrient acquisition are crucial for intracellular survival of Candida glabrata within macrophages
Open accessAbstract
Candida glabrata is both a human fungal commensal and an opportunistic pathogen which can withstand activities of the immune system. For example, C. glabrata can survive phagocytosis and replicates within macrophages. However, the mechanisms underlying intracellular survival remain unclear. In this work, we used a functional genomic approach to identify C. glabrata determinants necessary for survival within human monocyte-derived macrophages by screening a set of 433 deletion mutants. We identified 23 genes which are required to resist killing by macrophages. Based on homologies to Saccharomyces cerevisiae orthologs, these genes are putatively involved in cell wall biosynthesis, calcium homeostasis, nutritional and stress response, protein glycosylation, or iron homeostasis. Mutants were further characterized using a series of in vitro assays to elucidate the genes' functions in survival. We investigated different parameters of C. glabrata-phagocyte interactions: uptake by macrophages, replication within macrophages, phagosomal pH, and recognition of mutant cells by macrophages as indicated by production of reactive oxygen species and tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α). We further studied the cell surface integrity of mutant cells, their ability to grow under nutrient-limited conditions, and their susceptibility to stress conditions mirroring the harsh environment inside a phagosome. Additionally, resistance to killing by neutrophils was analyzed. Our data support the view that immune evasion is a key aspect of C. glabrata virulence and that increased immune recognition causes increased antifungal activities by macrophages. Furthermore, stress resistance and efficient nutrient acquisition, in particular, iron uptake, are crucial for intraphagosomal survival of C. glabrata.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
CgVps15, CgVps34, CgMnn10, CgMnn11, CgLdb17, and CgSla2 contributed to the inhibition of phagolysosomal acidification.
“C. glabrata is also known to impede maturation of the phagosome in macrophages [65,147], and the phosphoinositide 3-kinase subunits (CgVps15 and CgVsps34), mannosyltransferases (CgMnn10 and CgMnn11) and vesicular trafficking proteins (CgLdb17 and CgSla2) contributed to the inhibition of phagolysosomal acidification [147,149,150].”
From Candida glabrata: A Lot More Than Meets the Eye (2019) · cites this paper as [150]
C. glabrata activates pexophagy and autophagy processes.
“C. glabrata activates pexophagy and autophagy processes, undergoes chromatin remodeling and evades immune responses to survive and replicate in macrophages [84,147,150].”
From Candida glabrata: A Lot More Than Meets the Eye (2019) · cites this paper as [150]
C. glabrata undergoes chromatin remodeling.
“C. glabrata activates pexophagy and autophagy processes, undergoes chromatin remodeling and evades immune responses to survive and replicate in macrophages [84,147,150].”
From Candida glabrata: A Lot More Than Meets the Eye (2019) · cites this paper as [150]
C. glabrata evades immune responses to survive and replicate in macrophages.
“C. glabrata activates pexophagy and autophagy processes, undergoes chromatin remodeling and evades immune responses to survive and replicate in macrophages [84,147,150].”
From Candida glabrata: A Lot More Than Meets the Eye (2019) · cites this paper as [150]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 69 · Cited by 91
- Authors
- Seider, K., Gerwien, F., Kasper, L., Allert, S., Brunke, S., Jablonowski, N., Schwarzmüller, T., Barz, D., Rupp, S., Kuchler, K., & Hube, B.
- Affiliations
- Leibniz-Institut für Naturstoff-Forschung und Infektionsbiologie e. V. - Hans-Knöll-Institut (HKI) (DE)
- Jena University Hospital (DE)
- Max Perutz Labs (AT)
- Fraunhofer Institute for Interfacial Engineering and Biotechnology (DE)
- Venue
- Eukaryotic Cell
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 2014-01
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 170-183
- ISSN
- 1535-9778 (ISSN-L)
- 1535-9786
- PMC
- PMC3910963
- OpenAlex
- W2070667133
- Cited by
- 91
- References
- 69
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 5
- FWCI
- 5.59
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Locations
- Eukaryotic Cell (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Fraunhofer-Publica (Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Studienstiftung des Deutschen Volkes
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Antifungal resistance and susceptibility
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Fungal and yeast genetics research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Fungal Infections and Studies
- Keywords
- Candida glabrata, immune evasion, intracellular survival, macrophages, phagocytosis, phagosomal pH, stress tolerance, nutrient acquisition, iron homeostasis, cell wall biosynthesis, calcium homeostasis, protein glycosylation, deletion mutants, neutrophil killing, reactive oxygen species, TNF-α, fungal virulence, opportunistic fungal pathogens
- MeSH terms
- Calcium, Cell Line, Cell Wall, Fungal Proteins, Humans, Iron, Macrophages, Neutrophils, Phagocytosis, Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha, Virulence, Genome, Fungal, Gene Deletion, Reactive Oxygen Species, Oxidative Stress, Candida glabrata
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review