Regulation of the CgPdr1 Transcription Factor from the Pathogen Candida glabrata
Open accessAbstract
Candida glabrata is an opportunistic human pathogen that is increasingly associated with candidemia, owing in part to the intrinsic and acquired high tolerance the organism exhibits for the important clinical antifungal drug fluconazole. This elevated fluconazole resistance often develops through gain-of-function mutations in the zinc cluster-containing transcriptional regulator C. glabrata Pdr1 (CgPdr1). CgPdr1 induces the expression of an ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporter-encoding gene, Cg CDR1 . Saccharomyces cerevisiae has two CgPdr1 homologues called ScPdr1 and ScPdr3. These factors control the expression of an ABC transporter-encoding gene called Sc PDR5 , which encodes a homologue of Cg CDR1 . Loss of the mitochondrial genome (ρ 0 cell) or overexpression of the mitochondrial enzyme ScPsd1 induces Sc PDR5 expression in a strictly ScPdr3-dependent fashion. ScPdr3 requires the presence of a transcriptional Mediator subunit called Gal11 (Med15) to fully induce Sc PDR5 transcription in response to ρ 0 signaling. ScPdr1 does not respond to either ρ 0 signals or ScPsd1 overproduction. In this study, we employed transcriptional fusions between CgPdr1 target promoters, like Cg CDR1 , to demonstrate that CgPdr1 stimulates gene expression via binding to elements called pleiotropic drug response elements (PDREs). Deletion mapping and electrophoretic mobility shift assays demonstrated that a single PDRE in the Cg CDR1 promoter was capable of supporting ρ 0 -induced gene expression. Removal of one of the two ScGal11 homologues from C. glabrata caused a major defect in drug-induced expression of Cg CDR1 but had a quantitatively minor effect on ρ 0 -stimulated transcription. These data demonstrate that CgPdr1 appears to combine features of ScPdr1 and ScPdr3 to produce a transcription factor with chimeric regulatory properties.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
C. glabrata has a single PDRE-binding transcription factor CgPdr1 that shares homology almost equally with S. cerevisiae Pdr1 and Pdr3 and possesses a blend of their properties.
“A major difference between C. glabrata and S. cerevisiae in the PDR network regulation is that C. glabrata has the single PDRE-binding transcription factor called CgPdr1 which shares homology almost equally with the S. cerevisiae Pdr1 and Pdr3 proteins, and possesses a blend of the properties of each50.”
From SWI/SNF and the histone chaperone Rtt106 drive expression of the Pleiotropic Drug Resistance network genes (2022) · cites this paper as [50]
Fluconazole and ρ0 cells both involve a signal that activates the wild-type versions of Upc2A and/or Pdr1.
“We selected these two conditions for comparison since both involve a signal that activates the wild-type versions of Upc2A and/or Pdr1 (fluconazole or ρ0 cells, respectively) [8,32].”
From The Candida glabrata Upc2A transcription factor is a global regulator of antifungal drug resistance pathways (2021) · cites this paper as [32]
Overexpression of STB5 in Candida glabrata represses azole resistance, while its deletion produces a minor intensification in resistance.
“It was found that the overexpression of STB5 in C. glabrata represses azole resistance, while its deletion produces a minor intensification in resistance.”
From Candida glabrata Biofilms: How Far Have We Come? (2017) · cites this paper as [96]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 42 · Cited by 78
- Authors
- Paul, S., Schmidt, J. A., & Moye-Rowley, W. S.
- Affiliations
- University of Iowa (US)
- Department of Molecular Physiology and Biophysics, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa 52242
- ORCID
- Paul, Sanjoy
- Venue
- Eukaryotic Cell
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 2011-02
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 187-197
- ISSN
- 1535-9778 (ISSN-L)
- 1535-9786
- PMC
- PMC3067410
- OpenAlex
- W2159835373
- Cited by
- 78
- References
- 42
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 1.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Locations
- Eukaryotic Cell (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health
- National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R01GM049825, GM49825)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Fungal and yeast genetics research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Antifungal resistance and susceptibility
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Drug Transport and Resistance Mechanisms
- Keywords
- Candida glabrata, zinc cluster transcription factors, ABC transporters, fluconazole resistance, Gal11, Mediator complex, transcriptional regulation, candidemia
- MeSH terms
- Binding Sites, Carboxy-Lyases, Fungal Proteins, Humans, Mitochondria, Promoter Regions, Genetic, Transcription Factors, Fluconazole, Gene Expression Regulation, Fungal, Gene Deletion, Genes, Reporter, Gene Expression Profiling, Drug Resistance, Fungal, Candida glabrata, Cell Proliferation, Mediator Complex
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review