The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Metabolic-Flux Profiling of the Yeasts Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Pichia stipitis
Open accessAbstract
The so far largely uncharacterized central carbon metabolism of the yeast Pichia stipitis was explored in batch and glucose-limited chemostat cultures using metabolic-flux ratio analysis by nuclear magnetic resonance. The concomitantly characterized network of active metabolic pathways was compared to those identified in Saccharomyces cerevisiae , which led to the following conclusions. (i) There is a remarkably low use of the non-oxidative pentose phosphate (PP) pathway for glucose catabolism in S. cerevisiae when compared to P. stipitis batch cultures. (ii) Metabolism of P. stipitis batch cultures is fully respirative, which contrasts with the predominantly respiro-fermentative metabolic state of S. cerevisiae . (iii) Glucose catabolism in chemostat cultures of both yeasts is primarily oxidative. (iv) In both yeasts there is significant in vivo malic enzyme activity during growth on glucose. (v) The amino acid biosynthesis pathways are identical in both yeasts. The present investigation thus demonstrates the power of metabolic-flux ratio analysis for comparative profiling of central carbon metabolism in lower eukaryotes. Although not used for glucose catabolism in batch culture, we demonstrate that the PP pathway in S. cerevisiae has a generally high catabolic capacity by overexpressing the Escherichia coli transhydrogenase UdhA in phosphoglucose isomerase-deficient S. cerevisiae .
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Towards industrial pentose-fermenting yeast strains
Hahn-Hägerdal, B., Karhumaa, K., Fonseca, C., Spencer-Martins, I., & Gorwa-Grauslund, M. F. (2007) · Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology · doi:10.1007/s00253-006-0827-2 · Cited by 783
Sauer, U., Canonaco, F., Heri, S., Perrenoud, A., & Fischer, E. (2004) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.m311657200 · Cited by 616
Self-citationEngineering yeasts for xylose metabolism
Jeffries, T. W. (2006) · Current Opinion in Biotechnology · doi:10.1016/j.copbio.2006.05.008 · Cited by 517
Metabolic engineering for improved fermentation of pentoses by yeasts
Jeffries, T. W., & Jin, Y.-S. (2004) · Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology · doi:10.1007/s00253-003-1450-0 · Cited by 499
Adaptive laboratory evolution — harnessing the power of biology for metabolic engineering
Portnoy, V. A., Bezdan, D., & Zengler, K. (2011) · Current Opinion in Biotechnology · doi:10.1016/j.copbio.2011.03.007 · Cited by 309
Metadata
- Authors
- Fiaux, J., Çakar, Z. P., Sonderegger, M., Wüthrich, K., Szyperski, T., & Sauer, U.
- Venue
- Eukaryotic Cell
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 2003-02
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 170-180
- ISSN
- 1535-9778 (ISSN-L)
- 1535-9786
- OpenAlex
- W2123942641
- Cited by
- 160
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.11
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Metabolic-Flux Profiling of the Yeasts Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Pichia stipitis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/ec.2.1.170-180.2003
- The paper
- Fiaux, J., Çakar, Z. P., Sonderegger, M., Wüthrich, K., Szyperski, T., & Sauer, U. (2003). Metabolic-Flux Profiling of the Yeasts Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Pichia stipitis. Eukaryotic Cell. https://doi.org/10.1128/ec.2.1.170-180.2003
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.