Different Consequences of ACE2 and SWI5 Gene Disruptions for Virulence of Pathogenic and Nonpathogenic Yeasts
Open accessAbstract
Mutants of Candida albicans, Candida glabrata, and Saccharomyces cerevisiae with disruptions in the ACE2 gene and C. glabrata and S. cerevisiae swi5 disruption mutants were tested for virulence in a murine challenge model of disseminated yeast infection. All mutants showed a clumping phenotype, but clumping was minimized in challenge inocula by inclusion of chitinase in the growth medium. In animals rendered temporarily neutropenic by cyclophosphamide treatment, the C. glabrata ace2 null mutant was confirmed as hypervirulent: it led to early terminal illness and kidney, brain, and lung fungal burdens substantially and significantly larger than those in controls. The C. glabrata swi5 null mutant did not lead to terminal illness but generated significantly larger brain and lung burdens than those in controls. The C. albicans ace2 null mutant was very slightly attenuated and the S. cerevisiae ace2 and swi5 null mutants were substantially attenuated relative to their parental control strains. The phenotype of aggressive hypervirulence, unique to disruption of the C. glabrata ACE2 gene among the strains tested, was not seen when the C. glabrata ace2 strain was tested in immunologically intact mice. The different effects seen with these mutants rule out the clumping phenotype as the explanation for hypervirulence in the C. glabrata ace2 mutant. The absence of C. glabrata ace2 hypervirulence in healthy mice may be a tool for definitive future study of host-parasite cross talk in microbial opportunism.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Deletion of ACE2 in Candida glabrata provoked virulence.
“but in Candida glabrata provoked virulence (38, 39)”
From Cell aggregation mediated by <i>ACE2</i> deletion in <i>Candida auris</i> modulates fungal colonization and host immune responses in the skin (2024) · cites this paper as [38]
The Abstract reports that the C. glabrata ace2 null mutant was hypervirulent in temporarily neutropenic mice. The Discussion says tests in immunologically unaltered mice found no evidence of hypervirulence, so the unqualified claim omits a decisive host-condition limit. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredDeletion of ACE2 in Candida albicans and Saccharomyces cerevisiae resulted in attenuation of virulence.
“The deletion of ACE2 in C. albicans and Saccharomyces cerevisiae resulted in the attenuation of virulence”
From Cell aggregation mediated by <i>ACE2</i> deletion in <i>Candida auris</i> modulates fungal colonization and host immune responses in the skin (2024) · cites this paper as [38]
Disruption of the transcription factor CgAce2 leads to cell aggregation due to defects in cell separation, and hypervirulence.
“Furthermore, disruption of the transcription factor CgAce2 is known to lead to cell aggregation, due to defects in cell separation, and hypervirulence [72,73].”
From Candida glabrata: A Lot More Than Meets the Eye (2019) · cites this paper as [73]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 24 · Cited by 45
- Authors
- MacCallum, D. M., Findon, H., Kenny, C. C., Butler, G., Haynes, K., & Odds, F. C.
- Affiliations
- University of Aberdeen (GB)
- Imperial College London (GB)
- University College Dublin (IE)
- Venue
- Infection and Immunity
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 2006-09
- Volume
- 74
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 5244-5248
- ISSN
- 0019-9567 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-5522
- PMC
- PMC1594847
- OpenAlex
- W2164116124
- Cited by
- 45
- References
- 24
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 2.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Infection and Immunity (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Wellcome Trust (072420, 076954)
- Health Research Board
- Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBS/B/10331)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Antifungal resistance and susceptibility
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Fungal and yeast genetics research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Fungal Infections and Studies
- Keywords
- ACE2 gene, Candida glabrata, Candida albicans, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, hypervirulence, virulence, chitinase, neutropenia, host-parasite interactions, opportunistic fungal infection
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Candida albicans, Candidiasis, Chitinases, DNA-Binding Proteins, Female, Fungal Proteins, Mice, Inbred BALB C, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Transcription Factors, Virulence, Gene Deletion, Cell Cycle Proteins, Saccharomyces cerevisiae Proteins, Candida glabrata, Mice
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review