The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Some factors affecting selective adherence of microorganisms in the bovine mammary gland
Open accessAbstract
Some parameters affecting the adherence of microbes to the ductular epithelium of the bovine mammary gland were studied. Adherence increased from teat sinus to lactiferous sinus to the large ducts, and cells from the lactiferous sinus to the large ducts, and cells from the lactiferous sinus were used for all other experiments. There was no difference in adherence to cells from different quarters of the same cow, but there were significant differences between cows. Scanning electron microscopy suggested that the cells of the ductular epithelium undergo dynamic changes that probably result in secretion and/or desquamation. Adherence to cells could be demonstrated only at a late stage of these changes. The adherence of organisms associated with mastitis was studied using an in vitro test. Adherence generally paralleled prevalence as cause of disease, with Staphylococcus aureus and Streptococcus agalactiae adhering best. Strain variation suggested that virulence was related to adherence with S. agalactiae and S. dysgalactiae but not with S. aureus. It is proposed that specific adherence is an important aspect of pathogenesis of mastitis due to S. aureus and S. agalactiae.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Adherence of E. coli and K. pneumoniae to epithelial tissue does not play a major role in the pathogenesis of bovine mastitis.
“Adherence of E. coli and K. pneumoniae to epithelial tissue does not play a major role in the pathogenesis of bovine mastitis [15, 47].”
From Coliform mastitis (2003) · cites this paper as [15]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Nasal carriage of Staphylococcus aureus: epidemiology, underlying mechanisms, and associated risks
Kluytmans, J., van Belkum, A., & Verbrugh, H. (1997) · Clinical Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1128/cmr.10.3.505 · Cited by 2,595
Hogan, J., & Larry Smith, K. (2003) · Veterinary Research · doi:10.1051/vetres:2003022 · Cited by 245
Todhunter, D. A., Smith, K. L., Hogan, J. S., & Nelson, L. (1991) · Journal of Dairy Science · doi:10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(91)78230-1 · Cited by 14
Metadata
- Authors
- Frost, A. J., Wanasinghe, D. D., & Woolcock, J. B.
- Venue
- Infection and Immunity
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 1977-01
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 245-253
- ISSN
- 0019-9567 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-5522
- PMC
- PMC421355
- OpenAlex
- W2146647832
- Cited by
- 112
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2023: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 8.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- europepmc.org
- Locations
- Infection and Immunity (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Milk Quality and Mastitis in Dairy Cows
- Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Microbiology › Microbial infections and disease research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Antimicrobial Resistance in Staphylococcus
- Keywords
- bacterial adhesion, bovine mastitis, Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus agalactiae, Streptococcus dysgalactiae, strain differences, virulence, epithelial desquamation, pathogenesis
- MeSH terms
- Adhesiveness, Animals, Cattle, Female, Immune Sera, Mammary Glands, Animal, Mastitis, Pregnancy, Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus agalactiae
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review