The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Interference with granulocyte function by Staphylococcus epidermidis slime
Open accessAbstract
The interaction of Staphylococcus epidermidis slime with human neutrophils (PMN) was examined by using isolated slime and allowing bacteria to elaborate slime and other extracellular products in situ. S. epidermidis slime was found to contain a chemoattractant. Incubation of PMN with 50 micrograms or more of slime per ml inhibited subsequent chemotaxis of the PMN to n-formyl-methionyl-leucyl-phenylalanine by 27% and to zymosan-activated serum by 44 to 67% with increasing slime concentrations. S. epidermidis slime stimulated little degranulation of untreated PMN. After pretreatment of PMN with 5 micrograms of cytochalasin b per ml, slime predominantly induced release of specific granule contents (33.8% lactoferrin release by 250 micrograms of slime per ml versus 10% myeloperoxidase release by 250 micrograms of slime per ml). By a surface phagocytosis assay, PMN uptake of radiolabeled S. epidermidis which were incubated for 18 h on a plastic surface for slime expression was less than that for S. epidermidis adhered to the plastic for 2 h or grown in unsupplemented nutrient broth. These results suggest that S. epidermidis slime interaction with PMN may be potentially detrimental to host defense and may contribute to the ability of this organism to persist on surfaces of foreign bodies in the vascular or central nervous system.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Marrie, T. J., & Costerton, J. W. (1984) · Journal of Clinical Microbiology · doi:10.1128/jcm.19.5.687-693.1984 · Cited by 327 · cited 2×
“in deposits of an amorphous material (20, 35, 43).”
Background
Cited by
Ceri, H., Olson, M. E., Stremick, C., Read, R. R., Morck, D., & Buret, A. (1999) · Journal of Clinical Microbiology · doi:10.1128/jcm.37.6.1771-1776.1999 · Cited by 2,155
Coagulase-Negative Staphylococci
Becker, K., Heilmann, C., & Peters, G. (2014) · Clinical Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1128/cmr.00109-13 · Cited by 1,628
Self-citationStaphylococcus epidermidis infections
Vuong, C., & Otto, M. (2002) · Microbes and Infection · doi:10.1016/s1286-4579(02)01563-0 · Cited by 708
Vuong, C., Voyich, J. M., Fischer, E. R., Braughton, K. R., Whitney, A. R., DeLeo, F. R., & Otto, M. (2004) · Cellular Microbiology · doi:10.1046/j.1462-5822.2004.00367.x · Cited by 623
Guideline for Prevention of Intravascular-Device-Related Infections
Pearson, M. L., & The Hospital Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee (1996) · Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology · doi:10.2307/30141155 · Cited by 531
Metadata
- Authors
- Johnson, G. M., Lee, D. A., Regelmann, W. E., Gray, E. D., Peters, G., & Quie, P. G.
- Venue
- Infection and Immunity
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 1986-10
- Volume
- 54
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 13-20
- ISSN
- 0019-9567 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-5522
- OpenAlex
- W1942338244
- Cited by
- 245
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 5.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Interference with granulocyte function by Staphylococcus epidermidis slime. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/iai.54.1.13-20.1986
- The paper
- Johnson, G. M., Lee, D. A., Regelmann, W. E., Gray, E. D., Peters, G., & Quie, P. G. (1986). Interference with granulocyte function by Staphylococcus epidermidis slime. Infection and Immunity. https://doi.org/10.1128/iai.54.1.13-20.1986
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.