The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Volunteer studies of deletion mutants of Vibrio cholerae O1 prepared by recombinant techniques
Open accessAbstract
Vibrio cholerae O1 A-B- vaccine strain JBK 70 and A-B+ CVD 101 prepared by recombinant DNA techniques from pathogenic EI Tor Inaba N16961 and classical Ogawa 395, respectively, were fed to 38 volunteers in single doses of 10(4) to 10(10). Although severe diarrhea did not occur in any vaccine, more than one-half developed mild diarrhea. These attenuated strains colonized well and elicited prominent vibriocidal and antitoxic (CVD 101) antibody responses. Recipients of a single dose of JBK 70 were significantly protected when challenged with 10(6) wild-type N16961. Diarrhea occurred in 7 of 8 controls but in only 1 of 10 vaccines (P less than 0.003, 89% vaccine efficacy), demonstrating the potency of immune mechanisms that do not involve cholera antitoxin. Further derivatives were prepared to explore the pathogenesis of the residual diarrhea, considering that either intestinal colonization by the vaccine itself or accessory toxins might be responsible. CVD 102, an auxotrophic mutant of CVD 101, did not cause diarrhea but colonized poorly and elicited feeble immune responses. Derivatives of JBK 70 and CVD 101 (CVD 104 and 105) deleted of genes encoding the EI Tor hemolysin still caused mild diarrhea. Genetically engineered strains can be colonizing, highly immunogenic, and protective single-dose oral vaccines, but they must be further attenuated before they can be considered for use as public health tools.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Enteric bacterial toxins: mechanisms of action and linkage to intestinal secretion
Sears, C. L., & Kaper, J. B. (1996) · Microbiological Reviews · doi:10.1128/mmbr.60.1.167-215.1996 · Cited by 508
Self-citationProbiotic Escherichia coli Nissle 1917 inhibits leaky gut by enhancing mucosal integrity
Ukena, S. N., Singh, A., Dringenberg, U., Engelhardt, R., Seidler, U., Hansen, W., Bleich, A., Bruder, D., Franzke, A., Rogler, G., et al. (2007) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0001308 · Cited by 482
“When cholera toxin deletion mutants of Vibrio cholerae were given to healthy volunteers they still developed mild diarrhea [43].”
BackgroundLevine, M., Herrington, D., Losonsky, G., Tall, B., Kaper, J., Ketley, J., Tacket, C., & Cryz, S. (1988) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(88)90120-1 · Cited by 323
Self-citationBenitez, J. A., & Silva, A. J. (2016) · Toxicon · doi:10.1016/j.toxicon.2016.03.003 · Cited by 73
Metadata
- Authors
- Levine, M. M., Kaper, J. B., Herrington, D., Losonsky, G., Morris, J. G., Clements, M. L., Black, R. E., Tall, B., & Hall, R.
- Venue
- Infection and Immunity
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 1988-01
- Volume
- 56
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 161-167
- ISSN
- 0019-9567 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-5522
- OpenAlex
- W2112627596
- Cited by
- 294
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 11.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Volunteer studies of deletion mutants of Vibrio cholerae O1 prepared by recombinant techniques. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/iai.56.1.161-167.1988
- The paper
- Levine, M. M., Kaper, J. B., Herrington, D., Losonsky, G., Morris, J. G., Clements, M. L., Black, R. E., Tall, B., & Hall, R. (1988). Volunteer studies of deletion mutants of Vibrio cholerae O1 prepared by recombinant techniques. Infection and Immunity. https://doi.org/10.1128/iai.56.1.161-167.1988
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.