Cited by 59Clostridium difficile and Clostridium perfringens researchBotulinum Toxin and Related Neurological DisordersDiphtheria, Corynebacterium, and Tetanus

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Purification and characterization of Clostridium sordellii hemorrhagic toxin and cross-reactivity with Clostridium difficile toxin A (enterotoxin).

Open access
Martinez, R D, Wilkins, T D·1988·Infection and Immunity

Abstract

Hemorrhagic toxin (toxin HT) was purified from Clostridium sordellii culture filtrate. The purification steps included ultrafiltration through an XM-100 membrane filter and immunoaffinity chromatography, using a monoclonal antibody to toxin A of Clostridium difficile as the ligand. Toxin HT migrated as a major band with a molecular weight of 525,000 and a minor band at 450,000 on nondenaturing gradient polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. The molecular weight was estimated at 300,000 by sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. Isoelectric focusing indicated an apparent pI of 6.1. Toxin HT was cytotoxic for cultured cells and lethal for mice by intraperitoneal injection, and it elicited an accumulation of hemorrhagic fluid in rabbit ileal loops. Immunodiffusion analysis revealed a reaction of partial identity between toxins A and HT. Immunological cross-reactivity between these toxins was further demonstrated by immunoblotting and by neutralization of toxin HT biological activity with antibodies to toxin A. A sensitive indirect enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay was used to examine the affinity involved in homologous and heterologous antigen-antibody interactions. Our findings show that toxin HT has biological activities and immunological properties similar to those of toxin A; however, the toxins are not identical.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1128/iai.56.5.1215-1221.1988

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Martinez, R. D., & Wilkins, T. D.
Affiliations
Virginia Tech (US)
Venue
Infection and Immunity
Published
1988-05
Volume
56
Issue
5
Pages
1215-1221
ISSN
  • 0019-9567 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-5522
OpenAlex
W1858420797
Cited by
59
References
1
Citations by year
2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 1
FWCI
2.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Infection and Immunity (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (AI-15749)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Clostridium difficile and Clostridium perfringens research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Clinical Neurology › Botulinum Toxin and Related Neurological Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Diphtheria, Corynebacterium, and Tetanus
Keywords
Clostridium sordellii, hemorrhagic toxin, Clostridium difficile toxin A, enterotoxin, toxin purification, immunological cross-reactivity, toxin cytotoxicity, antibody-antigen affinity, toxin neutralization
MeSH terms
Animals, Bacterial Toxins, Biological Assay, Clostridium, Cross Reactions, Enterotoxins, Immunodiffusion, Hydrogen-Ion Concentration, Isoelectric Point, Molecular Weight, Rabbits, Temperature

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review