Interleukin-10 and Antigen-Presenting Cells Actively Suppress Th1 Cells in BALB/c Mice Infected with the Filarial Parasite Brugia pahangi
Open accessAbstract
Infection with the third-stage larvae (L3) of the filarial nematode Brugia results in a Th2-biased immune response in mice and humans. Previously we have shown that the production of interleukin 4 (IL-4) is critical for down-regulating polyclonal Th1 responses in L3-infected mice. However, the in vitro neutralization of IL-4 did not fully recover the defective polyclonal Th1 responses, nor did it result in the production of any antigen (Ag)-specific Th1 cytokines, suggesting that perhaps infection with L3 does not result in priming of Th1 cells in vivo. In this study, we analyzed the role of IL-10 and Ag-presenting cells (APCs) in the spleen as additional factors controlling the Th2 bias in infected mice. Our data show that IL-10 and APCs also contribute to the suppression of mitogen-driven Th1 responses of spleen cells from infected mice. In addition, the neutralization of IL-10 or the replacement of the resident APC population from spleen cell cultures resulted in the production of Ag-specific Th1 cytokines. Irradiated spleen cells from either L3-infected or uninfected mice were able to restore Ag-specific Th1 responses in vitro. Therefore, it appears that Brugia -reactive Th1 cells are primed following infection with L3, but are actively suppressed in vivo by a mechanism that involves IL-10 and the resident APC population, but not IL-4. These results indicate that a complex interplay of cytokines and cell populations underscores the Th2-polarized response in L3-infected mice.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
IL-10 expression is related to hyporesponsiveness in lymphatic filariasis.
“IL-10 expression is related to hyporesponsiveness in lymphatic filariasis (248,316,350)”
From Human and animal dirofilariasis: The emergence of a zoonotic mosaic (2012) · cites this paper as [316]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 34 · Cited by 77
- Authors
- Osborne, J., & Devaney, E.
- Affiliations
- University of Glasgow (GB)
- ORCID
- Devaney, Eileen
- Venue
- Infection and Immunity
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 1999-04
- Volume
- 67
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1599-1605
- ISSN
- 0019-9567 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-5522
- PMC
- PMC96502
- OpenAlex
- W2126113780
- Cited by
- 77
- References
- 34
- Citations by year
- 2022: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 6.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Infection and Immunity (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- ENLIGHTEN (Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling Islam) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Wellcome Trust
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Parasitic Diseases Research and Treatment
- Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Parasitology › Parasites and Host Interactions
- Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › T-cell and B-cell Immunology
- Keywords
- IL-10, antigen-presenting cells, Th2 bias, Brugia pahangi, filariasis, third-stage larvae, IL-4, Th1 cytokines, spleen, cytokine neutralization
- MeSH terms
- Aedes, Animals, Antibodies, Monoclonal, Antigen-Presenting Cells, Antigens, Helminth, Cells, Cultured, Concanavalin A, Filariasis, Male, Mice, Inbred BALB C, Mitogens, Neutralization Tests, Nylons, Spleen, Interleukin-10, Brugia pahangi, Th1 Cells, Mice
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review