Cited by 77Parasitic Diseases Research and TreatmentParasites and Host InteractionsT-cell and B-cell Immunology

Interleukin-10 and Antigen-Presenting Cells Actively Suppress Th1 Cells in BALB/c Mice Infected with the Filarial Parasite Brugia pahangi

Open access
Osborne, Julie, Devaney, Eileen·1999·Infection and Immunity

Abstract

Infection with the third-stage larvae (L3) of the filarial nematode Brugia results in a Th2-biased immune response in mice and humans. Previously we have shown that the production of interleukin 4 (IL-4) is critical for down-regulating polyclonal Th1 responses in L3-infected mice. However, the in vitro neutralization of IL-4 did not fully recover the defective polyclonal Th1 responses, nor did it result in the production of any antigen (Ag)-specific Th1 cytokines, suggesting that perhaps infection with L3 does not result in priming of Th1 cells in vivo. In this study, we analyzed the role of IL-10 and Ag-presenting cells (APCs) in the spleen as additional factors controlling the Th2 bias in infected mice. Our data show that IL-10 and APCs also contribute to the suppression of mitogen-driven Th1 responses of spleen cells from infected mice. In addition, the neutralization of IL-10 or the replacement of the resident APC population from spleen cell cultures resulted in the production of Ag-specific Th1 cytokines. Irradiated spleen cells from either L3-infected or uninfected mice were able to restore Ag-specific Th1 responses in vitro. Therefore, it appears that Brugia -reactive Th1 cells are primed following infection with L3, but are actively suppressed in vivo by a mechanism that involves IL-10 and the resident APC population, but not IL-4. These results indicate that a complex interplay of cytokines and cell populations underscores the Th2-polarized response in L3-infected mice.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1128/iai.67.4.1599-1605.1999

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 34 · Cited by 77

Authors
Osborne, J., & Devaney, E.
Affiliations
University of Glasgow (GB)
Venue
Infection and Immunity
Published
1999-04
Volume
67
Issue
4
Pages
1599-1605
ISSN
  • 0019-9567 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-5522
OpenAlex
W2126113780
Cited by
77
References
34
Citations by year
2022: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
FWCI
6.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Infection and Immunity (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ENLIGHTEN (Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling Islam) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Wellcome Trust
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Parasitic Diseases Research and Treatment
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Parasitology › Parasites and Host Interactions
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › T-cell and B-cell Immunology
Keywords
IL-10, antigen-presenting cells, Th2 bias, Brugia pahangi, filariasis, third-stage larvae, IL-4, Th1 cytokines, spleen, cytokine neutralization
MeSH terms
Aedes, Animals, Antibodies, Monoclonal, Antigen-Presenting Cells, Antigens, Helminth, Cells, Cultured, Concanavalin A, Filariasis, Male, Mice, Inbred BALB C, Mitogens, Neutralization Tests, Nylons, Spleen, Interleukin-10, Brugia pahangi, Th1 Cells, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review