The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Reassessing the Role of Staphylococcus aureus Clumping Factor and Fibronectin-Binding Protein by Expression in Lactococcus lactis
Open accessAbstract
Since Staphylococcus aureus expresses multiple pathogenic factors, studying their individual roles in single-gene-knockout mutants is difficult. To circumvent this problem, S. aureus clumping factor A ( clfA ) and fibronectin-binding protein A ( fnbA ) genes were constitutively expressed in poorly pathogenic Lactococcus lactis using the recently described pOri23 vector. The recombinant organisms were tested in vitro for their adherence to immobilized fibrinogen and fibronectin and in vivo for their ability to infect rats with catheter-induced aortic vegetations. In vitro, both clfA and fnbA increased the adherence of lactococci to their specific ligands to a similar extent as the S. aureus gene donor. In vivo, the minimum inoculum size producing endocarditis in ≥80% of the rats (80% infective dose [ID 80 ]) with the parent lactococcus was ≥10 7 CFU. In contrast, clfA -expressing and fnbA -expressing lactococci required only 10 5 CFU to infect the majority of the animals ( P < 0.00005). This was comparable to the infectivities of classical endocarditis pathogens such as S. aureus and streptococci (ID 80 = 10 4 to 10 5 CFU) in this model. The results confirmed the role of clfA in endovascular infection, but with a much higher degree of confidence than with single-gene-inactivated staphylococci. Moreover, they identified fnbA as a critical virulence factor of equivalent importance. This was in contrast to previous studies that produced controversial results regarding this very determinant. Taken together, the present observations suggest that if antiadhesin therapy were to be developed, at least both of the clfA and fnbA products should be blocked for the therapy to be effective.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Tong, S. Y. C., Davis, J. S., Eichenberger, E., Holland, T. L., & Fowler, V. G. (2015) · Clinical Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1128/cmr.00134-14 · Cited by 5,192
Que, Y.-A., Haefliger, J.-A., Piroth, L., François, P., Widmer, E., Entenza, J. M., Sinha, B., Herrmann, M., Francioli, P., Vaudaux, P., et al. (2005) · The Journal of Experimental Medicine · doi:10.1084/jem.20050125 · Cited by 286
Self-citationBates, D. M., Eiff, C. V., McNamara, P. J., Peters, G., Yeaman, M. R., Bayer, A. S., & Proctor, R. A. (2003) · The Journal of Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1086/374642 · Cited by 106
Metadata
- Authors
- Que, Y.-A., François, P., Haefliger, J.-A., Entenza, J.-M., Vaudaux, P., & Moreillon, P.
- Venue
- Infection and Immunity
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 2001-10
- Volume
- 69
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 6296-6302
- ISSN
- 0019-9567 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-5522
- OpenAlex
- W2165547120
- Cited by
- 177
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.85
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Reassessing the Role of Staphylococcus aureus Clumping Factor and Fibronectin-Binding Protein by Expression in Lactococcus lactis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/iai.69.10.6296-6302.2001
- The paper
- Que, Y.-A., François, P., Haefliger, J.-A., Entenza, J.-M., Vaudaux, P., & Moreillon, P. (2001). Reassessing the Role of Staphylococcus aureus Clumping Factor and Fibronectin-Binding Protein by Expression in Lactococcus lactis. Infection and Immunity. https://doi.org/10.1128/iai.69.10.6296-6302.2001
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.