Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 193

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Strain-Dependent Differences in the Regulatory Roles of sarA and agr in Staphylococcus aureus

Open access
Blevins, Jon S., Beenken, Karen E., Elasri, Mohamed O., Hurlburt, Barry K., Smeltzer, Mark S.·2002·Infection and Immunity

Abstract

The accessory gene regulator ( agr ) and the staphylococcal accessory regulator ( sar ) are central regulatory elements that control the production of Staphylococcus aureus virulence factors. To date, the functions of these loci have been defined almost exclusively using RN6390, which is representative of the laboratory strain 8325-4. However, RN6390 was recently shown to have a mutation in rsbU that results in a phenotype resembling that of a sigB mutant (I. Kullik et al., J. Bacteriol. 180:4814–4820, 1998). For that reason, it remains unclear whether the regulatory events defined in RN6390 are representative of the events that take place in clinical isolates of S. aureus . To address this issue, we generated mutations in the sarA and agr loci of three laboratory strains (RN6390, Newman, and S6C) and four clinical isolates (UAMS-1, UAMS-601, DB, and SC-1). Mutation of sarA in the cna -positive strains UAMS-1 and UAMS-601 resulted in an increased capacity to bind collagen, while mutation of agr had little impact. Northern blot analysis confirmed that the increase in collagen binding was due to increased cna transcription. Without exception, mutation of sarA resulted in increased production of proteases and a decreased capacity to bind fibronectin. Mutation of agr had the opposite effect. Although mutation of sarA resulted in a slight reduction in fnbA transcription, changes in the ability to bind fibronectin appeared to be more directly correlated with changes in protease activity. Lipase production was reduced in both sarA and agr mutants. While mutation of sarA in RN6390 resulted in reduced hemolytic activity, it had the opposite effect in all other strains. There appeared to be reduced levels of the sarC transcript in RN6390, but there was no difference in the overall pattern of sar transcription or the production of SarA. Although mutation of sarA resulted in decreased RNAIII transcription, this effect was not evident under all growth conditions. Taken together, these results suggest that studies defining the regulatory roles of sarA and agr by using RN6390 are not always representative of the events that occur in clinical isolates of S. aureus .

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1128/iai.70.2.470-480.2002

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 193

Metadata

Authors
Blevins, J. S., Beenken, K. E., Elasri, M. O., Hurlburt, B. K., & Smeltzer, M. S.
Venue
Infection and Immunity
Published
2002-02
Volume
70
Issue
2
Pages
470-480
ISSN
  • 0019-9567 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-5522
OpenAlex
W2155419526
Cited by
193
References
0
FWCI
9.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Strain-Dependent Differences in the Regulatory Roles of sarA and agr in Staphylococcus aureus. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/iai.70.2.470-480.2002
The paper
Blevins, J. S., Beenken, K. E., Elasri, M. O., Hurlburt, B. K., & Smeltzer, M. S. (2002). Strain-Dependent Differences in the Regulatory Roles of sarA and agr in Staphylococcus aureus. Infection and Immunity. https://doi.org/10.1128/iai.70.2.470-480.2002

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.