The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
In Situ Growth Rates and Biofilm Development of Pseudomonas aeruginosa Populations in Chronic Lung Infections
Open accessAbstract
The growth dynamics of bacterial pathogens within infected hosts are a fundamental but poorly understood feature of most infections. We have focused on the in situ distribution and growth characteristics of two prevailing and transmissible Pseudomonas aeruginosa clones that have caused chronic lung infections in cystic fibrosis (CF) patients for more than 20 years. We used fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) directly on sputum specimens to examine the spatial distribution of the infecting P. aeruginosa cells. Mucoid variants were present in sputum as cell clusters surrounded by an extracellular matrix, whereas nonmucoid variants were present mainly as dispersed cells. To obtain estimates of the growth rates of P. aeruginosa in CF lungs, we used quantitative FISH to indirectly measure growth rates of bacteria in sputum samples (reflecting the in vivo lung conditions). The concentration of rRNA in bacteria isolated from sputa was measured and correlated with the rRNA contents of the same bacteria growing in vitro at defined rates. The results showed that most cells were actively growing with doubling times of between 100 and 200 min, with some growing even faster. Only a small stationary-phase subpopulation seemed to be present in sputa. This was found for both mucoid and nonmucoid variants despite their different organizations in sputum. The results suggest that the bacterial population may be confronted with selection forces that favor optimized growth activities. This scenario constitutes a new perspective on the adaptation and evolution of P. aeruginosa during chronic infections in CF patients in particular and on long-term infections in general.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
rRNA Transcription in Escherichia coli
Paul, B. J., Ross, W., Gaal, T., & Gourse, R. L. (2004) · Annual Review of Genetics · doi:10.1146/annurev.genet.38.072902.091347 · Cited by 336
Cited by
The role of bacterial biofilms in chronic infections
Bjarnsholt, T. (2013) · APMIS · doi:10.1111/apm.12099 · Cited by 1,080
Phenotypes of Non-Attached Pseudomonas aeruginosa Aggregates Resemble Surface Attached Biofilm
Alhede, M., Kragh, K. N., Qvortrup, K., Allesen-Holm, M., van Gennip, M., Christensen, L. D., Jensen, P. Ø., Nielsen, A. K., Parsek, M., Wozniak, D., et al. (2011) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0027943 · Cited by 306
Self-citationFerreira, J. A. G., Penner, J. C., Moss, R. B., Haagensen, J. A. J., Clemons, K. V., Spormann, A. M., Nazik, H., Cohen, K., Banaei, N., Carolino, E., et al. (2015) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0134692 · Cited by 92
Self-citationFarookhi, H., & Xia, X. (2024) · Microorganisms · doi:10.3390/microorganisms12040768 · Cited by 7
Metadata
- Authors
- Yang, L., Haagensen, J. A. J., Jelsbak, L., Johansen, H. K., Sternberg, C., Høiby, N., & Molin, S.
- Venue
- Journal of Bacteriology
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 2008-04-15
- Volume
- 190
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 2767-2776
- ISSN
- 0021-9193 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-5530
- OpenAlex
- W2165928400
- Cited by
- 225
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 4.19
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: In Situ Growth Rates and Biofilm Development of Pseudomonas aeruginosa Populations in Chronic Lung Infections. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/jb.01581-07
- The paper
- Yang, L., Haagensen, J. A. J., Jelsbak, L., Johansen, H. K., Sternberg, C., Høiby, N., & Molin, S. (2008). In Situ Growth Rates and Biofilm Development of Pseudomonas aeruginosa Populations in Chronic Lung Infections. Journal of Bacteriology. https://doi.org/10.1128/jb.01581-07
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.