The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Quorum Sensing Controls Biofilm Formation in Vibrio cholerae through Modulation of Cyclic Di-GMP Levels and Repression of vpsT
Open accessAbstract
Two chemical signaling systems, quorum sensing (QS) and 3′,5′-cyclic diguanylic acid (c-di-GMP), reciprocally control biofilm formation in Vibrio cholerae . QS is the process by which bacteria communicate via the secretion and detection of autoinducers, and in V. cholerae , QS represses biofilm formation. c-di-GMP is an intracellular second messenger that contains information regarding local environmental conditions, and in V. cholerae , c-di-GMP activates biofilm formation. Here we show that HapR, a major regulator of QS, represses biofilm formation in V. cholerae through two distinct mechanisms. HapR controls the transcription of 14 genes encoding a group of proteins that synthesize and degrade c-di-GMP. The net effect of this transcriptional program is a reduction in cellular c-di-GMP levels at high cell density and, consequently, a decrease in biofilm formation. Increasing the c-di-GMP concentration at high cell density to the level present in the low-cell-density QS state restores biofilm formation, showing that c-di-GMP is epistatic to QS in the control of biofilm formation in V. cholerae . In addition, HapR binds to and directly represses the expression of the biofilm transcriptional activator, vpsT . Together, our results suggest that V. cholerae integrates information about the vicinal bacterial community contained in extracellular QS autoinducers with the intracellular environmental information encoded in c-di-GMP to control biofilm formation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Structure of the Tet repressor-tetracycline complex and regulation of antibiotic resistance
Hinrichs, W., Kisker, C., Düvel, M., Müller, A., Tovar, K., Hillen, W., & Saenger, W. (1994) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.8153629 · Cited by 408
Cited by
The developmental model of microbial biofilms: ten years of a paradigm up for review
Monds, R. D., & O’Toole, G. A. (2009) · Trends in Microbiology · doi:10.1016/j.tim.2008.11.001 · Cited by 532
Sambanthamoorthy, K., Sloup, R. E., Parashar, V., Smith, J. M., Kim, E. E., Semmelhack, M. F., Neiditch, M. B., & Waters, C. M. (2012) · Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy · doi:10.1128/aac.01396-12 · Cited by 151
Self-citationKnecht, L. D., O'Connor, G., Mittal, R., Liu, X. Z., Daftarian, P., Deo, S. K., & Daunert, S. (2016) · EBioMedicine · doi:10.1016/j.ebiom.2016.05.037 · Cited by 132
Kim, S. M., Park, J. H., Lee, H. S., Kim, W. B., Ryu, J. M., Han, H. J., & Choi, S. H. (2013) · Infection and Immunity · doi:10.1128/iai.00561-13 · Cited by 75
The role of RNA regulators, quorum sensing and c‐di‐GMP in bacterial biofilm formation
Condinho, M., Carvalho, B., Cruz, A., Pinto, S. N., Arraiano, C. M., & Pobre, V. (2023) · FEBS Open Bio · doi:10.1002/2211-5463.13389 · Cited by 64
Metadata
- Authors
- Waters, C. M., Lu, W., Rabinowitz, J. D., & Bassler, B. L.
- Venue
- Journal of Bacteriology
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 2008-04
- Volume
- 190
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 2527-2536
- ISSN
- 0021-9193 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-5530
- OpenAlex
- W2131036374
- Cited by
- 425
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 9.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.