The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Two Pathways of Glutamate Fermentation by Anaerobic Bacteria
Open accessAbstract
Two pathways are involved in the fermentation of glutamate to acetate, butyrate, carbon dioxide, and ammonia—the methylaspartate and the hydroxyglutarate pathways which are used by Clostridium tetanomorphum and Peptococcus aerogenes , respectively. Although these pathways give rise to the same products, they are easily distinguished by different labeling patterns of the butyrate when [4- 14 C]glutamate is used as substrate. Schmidt degradation of the radioactive butyrate from C. tetanomorphum yielded equally labeled propionate and carbon dioxide, whereas nearly all the radioactivity of the butyrate from P. aerogenes was recovered in the corresponding propionate. This procedure was used as a test for the pathway of glutamate fermentation by 15 strains (9 species) of anaerobic bacteria. The labeling patterns of the butyrate indicate that glutamate is fermented via the methylaspartate pathway by C. tetani, C. cochlearium , and C. saccarobutyricum , and via the hydroxyglutarate pathway by Acidaminococcus fermentans, C. microsporum, Fusobacterium nucleatum , and F. fusiformis . Enzymes specific for each pathway were assayed in crude extracts of the above organisms. 3-Methylaspartase was found only in clostridia which use the methylaspartate pathway, including Clostridium SB4 and C. sticklandii , which probably degrade glutamate to acetate and carbon dioxide by using a second amino acid as hydrogen acceptor. High levels of 2-hydroxyglutarate dehydrogenase were found exclusively in organisms that use the hydroxyglutarate pathway. The data indicate that only two pathways are involved in the fermentation of glutamate by the bacteria analyzed. The methylaspartate pathway appears to be used only by species of Clostridium , whereas the hydroxyglutarate pathway is used by representatives of several genera.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Energy conservation in chemotrophic anaerobic bacteria
Thauer, R. K., Jungermann, K., & Decker, K. (1977) · Bacteriological Reviews · doi:10.1128/br.41.1.100-180.1977 · Cited by 4,146
Buckel, W., & Thauer, R. K. (2013) · Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Bioenergetics · doi:10.1016/j.bbabio.2012.07.002 · Cited by 797
Self-citationEnergy conservation via electron-transferring flavoprotein in anaerobic bacteria
Herrmann, G., Jayamani, E., Mai, G., & Buckel, W. (2008) · Journal of Bacteriology · doi:10.1128/jb.01422-07 · Cited by 407
Self-citationThe end products of the metabolism of aromatic amino acids by Clostridia
Elsden, S. R., Hilton, M. G., & Waller, J. M. (1976) · Archives of Microbiology · doi:10.1007/bf00425340 · Cited by 396
Schink, B., & Stams, A. J. M. (2013) · The Prokaryotes · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-30123-0_59 · Cited by 371
Metadata
- Authors
- Buckel, W., & Barker, H. A.
- Venue
- Journal of Bacteriology
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 1974-03
- Volume
- 117
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 1248-1260
- ISSN
- 0021-9193 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-5530
- OpenAlex
- W2139563168
- Cited by
- 214
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 1.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Two Pathways of Glutamate Fermentation by Anaerobic Bacteria. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/jb.117.3.1248-1260.1974
- The paper
- Buckel, W., & Barker, H. A. (1974). Two Pathways of Glutamate Fermentation by Anaerobic Bacteria. Journal of Bacteriology. https://doi.org/10.1128/jb.117.3.1248-1260.1974
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.