Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 528

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Uptake and retention of metals by cell walls of Bacillus subtilis

Open access
Beveridge, T J, Murray, R G·1976·Journal of Bacteriology

Abstract

Isolated walls of Bacillus subtilis Marburg, prepared in a manner which avoided metal contamination other than by the growth medium, were incubated in dilute metal solutions, separated by membrane filtration (0.22 mum), and monitored by atomic absorption to give uptake data for 18 metals. Substantial amounts of Mg2+, Fe3+, Cu2+, Na+, and K+ (amounts which were often visible as Au3+, and Ni2+ (the higher atomic-numbered elements also visible as electron scattering), and small amounts of Hg2+, Sr2+, Pb2+, and Ag+ were taken into the wall. Some (Li+, Ba2+, Co2+, and Al3+) were not absorbed. Most metals which had atomic numbers greater than 11 and which could be detected by electron microscopy appeared to diffusely stain thin sections of the wall. Magnesium, on the other hand, partitioned into the central region, and these sections of walls resisted ruthenium red staining, which was not true for the other metals. Areas of the walls also acted as nucleation sites for the growth of microscopic elemental gold crystals when incubated in solutions of auric chloride. Retention or displacement of the metals was estimated by a "chromatographic" method using the walls cross-linked by the carbodiimide reaction to adipic hydrazide agarose beads (which did not take up metal but reduced the metal binding capacity of the walls by ca. 1%) packed in a column. When a series of 12 metal solutions was passed through the column, it became evident that Mg2+, Ca2+, Fe3+, and Ni2+ were strongly bound to the walls and could be detected by both atomic absorption and by their electron-scattering power in thin sections, qhereas the other metals were fisplaced or replaced. Partial lysozyme digestion of the walls (causing a 28% loss of a [3H]diaminopimelic acid label) greatly diminished the Mg2+ retention but not that of Ca2+, Fe3+, or Ni2+, indicating that there are select sites for various cations.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1128/jb.127.3.1502-1518.1976

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 528

Metadata

Authors
Beveridge, T. J., & Murray, R. G.
Venue
Journal of Bacteriology
Published
1976-09
Volume
127
Issue
3
Pages
1502-1518
ISSN
  • 0021-9193 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-5530
OpenAlex
W2133674026
Cited by
528
References
1
FWCI
21.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Uptake and retention of metals by cell walls of Bacillus subtilis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/jb.127.3.1502-1518.1976
The paper
Beveridge, T. J., & Murray, R. G. (1976). Uptake and retention of metals by cell walls of Bacillus subtilis. Journal of Bacteriology. https://doi.org/10.1128/jb.127.3.1502-1518.1976

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.