The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Characterization of a cellulose-binding, cellulase-containing complex in Clostridium thermocellum
Open accessAbstract
The isolation and biochemical characterization of the extracellular form of a cellulose-binding factor (CBF) from Clostridium thermocellum is described. The CBF was isolated from the culture supernatant by a two-step procedure which included affinity chromatography on cellulose and gel filtration on Sepharose 4B. The isolated CBF was homogeneous as determined by immunoelectrophoresis, polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, gel filtration, and analytical ultracentrifugation analysis. The CBF was found to form a complex which exhibited a molecular weight estimated at 2.1 million. Electron microscopic analysis of negatively stained preparations of the isolated CBF revealed a particulate, multisubunit entity of complicated quaternary structure. The molecule appeared to be about 18 nm in size. Although urea failed to break the complex into its component parts, polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis in the presence of sodium dodecyl sulfate resolved the CBF complex into 14 polypeptide bands. Immunoprecipitation experiments confirmed that these polypeptides indeed formed part of the same complex. Interestingly, by using the whole-cell immunization procedure described in the accompanying article (Bayer et al., J. Bacteriol., 156:818-827, 1983) only one CBF subunit (Mr = 210,000) was found to be antigenically active. By using a gel-overlay assay technique, at least eight of the remaining CBF-associated polypeptide components were shown to exhibit cellulolytic activity. The results are consistent with the contention that the CBF comprises a discrete, multisubunit complex or group of closely related complexes which exhibit separate antigenic and multiple cellulase activities in addition to the property of cellulose binding.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Bradford, M. M. (1976) · Analytical Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/0003-2697(76)90527-3 · Cited by 255,302
Cited by
Soil enzymes in a changing environment: Current knowledge and future directions
Burns, R. G., DeForest, J. L., Marxsen, J., Sinsabaugh, R. L., Stromberger, M. E., Wallenstein, M. D., Weintraub, M. N., & Zoppini, A. (2013) · Soil Biology and Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.soilbio.2012.11.009 · Cited by 2,552
Fontes, C. M. G. A., & Gilbert, H. J. (2010) · Annual Review of Biochemistry · doi:10.1146/annurev-biochem-091208-085603 · Cited by 555
The cellulosome — A treasure-trove for biotechnology
Bayer, E. A., Morag, E., & Lamed, R. (1994) · Trends in Biotechnology · doi:10.1016/0167-7799(94)90039-6 · Cited by 466
Self-citationThird Generation Biofuels via Direct Cellulose Fermentation
Carere, C. R., Sparling, R., Cicek, N., & Levin, D. B. (2008) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms9071342 · Cited by 339
A Life with Acetogens, Thermophiles, and Cellulolytic Anaerobes
Ljungdahl, L. G. (2009) · Annual Review of Microbiology · doi:10.1146/annurev.micro.091208.073617 · Cited by 73
Metadata
- Authors
- Lamed, R., Setter, E., & Bayer, E. A.
- Venue
- Journal of Bacteriology
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 1983-11
- Volume
- 156
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 828-836
- ISSN
- 0021-9193 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-5530
- OpenAlex
- W1528715746
- Cited by
- 571
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 16.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Characterization of a cellulose-binding, cellulase-containing complex in Clostridium thermocellum. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/jb.156.2.828-836.1983
- The paper
- Lamed, R., Setter, E., & Bayer, E. A. (1983). Characterization of a cellulose-binding, cellulase-containing complex in Clostridium thermocellum. Journal of Bacteriology. https://doi.org/10.1128/jb.156.2.828-836.1983
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.