Cited by 160Yersinia bacterium, plague, ectoparasites researchEscherichia coli research studiesBacterial Genetics and Biotechnology

Virulence plasmid-associated autoagglutination in Yersinia spp

Open access
Skurnik, M, Bölin, I, Heikkinen, H, Piha, S, Wolf-Watz, H·1984·Journal of Bacteriology

Abstract

The autoagglutination of Yersinia enterocolitica was dependent on the presence of the virulence plasmid and on the active growth of bacteria in tissue culture media at 37 degrees C. Cultures with a high initial concentration of bacteria failed to autoagglutinate , indicating that synthesis of new virulence plasmid-associated surface factors was essential for autoagglutination. The synthesis of a plasmid-encoded polypeptide (molecular weight, 240,000), designated P1, that could be dissociated under strongly reducing conditions into subunits of 52,500 daltons was found to be correlated with autoagglutination. Further, a strain of Yersinia pseudotuberculosis [ YPIII ( PIB102 )], which has Tn5 inserted within the structural gene of P1 that prevents the synthesis of P1, failed to autoagglutinate , in contrast to the wild-type strain, strongly indicating that P1 is involved in this phenomenon. It was also found by immunoblotting that in addition to the common response to temperature, the P1 proteins of Y. enterocolitica and Y. pseudotuberculosis were immunologically related.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1128/jb.158.3.1033-1036.1984

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • YadA is involved in autoaggregation.

    “The Yersinia adhesin YadA is involved in autoaggregation [9] and is crucial for the packing density of microcolonies observed in Y. enterocolitica in collagen gels [145].”

    From Bacterial autoaggregation (2018) · cites this paper as [9]

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 21 · Cited by 160

Authors
Skurnik, M., Bölin, I., Heikkinen, H., Piha, S., & Wolf-Watz, H.
Venue
Journal of Bacteriology
Published
1984-06
Volume
158
Issue
3
Pages
1033-1036
ISSN
  • 0021-9193 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-5530
OpenAlex
W1542429131
Cited by
160
References
21
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 2
FWCI
6.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Bacteriology (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Yersinia bacterium, plague, ectoparasites research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Endocrinology › Escherichia coli research studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Bacterial Genetics and Biotechnology
Keywords
Yersinia enterocolitica, Yersinia pseudotuberculosis, virulence plasmid, autoagglutination, Tn5 insertion, bacterial virulence
MeSH terms
Agglutination, Animals, Bacterial Proteins, Electrophoresis, Polyacrylamide Gel, Guinea Pigs, Molecular Weight, Plasmids, Virulence, Yersinia enterocolitica, Yersinia Infections

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review