The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Indigenous plasmids in Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato: conjugative transfer and role in copper resistance
Open accessAbstract
Twenty strains of Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato were examined for the presence of plasmid DNA. P. syringae pv. tomato plasmids were grouped into five size classes: class A ranged from 95 to 103 kilobases (kb); class B ranged from 71 to 83 kb; class C ranged from 59 to 67 kb; class D ranged from 37 to 39 kb; and class E was 29 kb. All strains contained at least two plasmids in classes A and B. The conjugative ability of P. syringae pv. tomato plasmids in three strains was demonstrated by mobilization of the nonconjugative plasmid RSF1010 into Pseudomonas syringae pv. syringae recipients. Plasmids from the three conjugative strains were labeled with Tn5. Four conjugative plasmids were identified by their repeated transfer to P. syringae pv. syringae recipients. P. syringae pv. tomato strains varied in sensitivity to copper sulfate (CuSO4): MICs were 0.4 to 0.6 mM for sensitive strains, 1.2 mM for moderately resistant strains, and 1.6 to 2.0 mM for very resistant strains. One very resistant strain, PT23, functioned as a donor of copper resistance. Recipient P. syringae pv. syringae strains PS51 and PS61 were inhibited by 0.1 mM CuSO4, whereas the CuSO4 MICs for transconjugant strains PS51(pPT23A) and PS61(pPT23C) were 1.8 and 2.6 mM, respectively. P. syringae pv. tomato strains PT12.2 and PT17.2 were inhibited by 0.6 mM copper sulfate, but their copper sulfate MICs were 2.6 and 1.8 mM, respectively, when they acquired pPT23C. Therefore, copper resistance in PT23 was controlled by two conjugative plasmids, designated pPT23A (101 kb) and pPT23C (67 kb).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Thirteen decades of antimicrobial copper compounds applied in agriculture. A review
Lamichhane, J. R., Osdaghi, E., Behlau, F., Köhl, J., Jones, J. B., & Aubertot, J.-N. (2018) · Agronomy for Sustainable Development · doi:10.1007/s13593-018-0503-9 · Cited by 601
DNA Probe Method for the Detection of Specific Microorganisms in the Soil Bacterial Community
Holben, W. E., Jansson, J. K., Chelm, B. K., & Tiedje, J. M. (1988) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.54.3.703-711.1988 · Cited by 573
Copper tolerance and virulence in bacteria
Ladomersky, E., & Petris, M. J. (2015) · Metallomics · doi:10.1039/c4mt00327f · Cited by 280
Metadata
- Authors
- Bender, C. L., & Cooksey, D. A.
- Venue
- Journal of Bacteriology
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 1986-02
- Volume
- 165
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 534-541
- ISSN
- 0021-9193 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-5530
- OpenAlex
- W1653189392
- Cited by
- 258
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 12.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Indigenous plasmids in Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato: conjugative transfer and role in copper resistance. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/jb.165.2.534-541.1986
- The paper
- Bender, C. L., & Cooksey, D. A. (1986). Indigenous plasmids in Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato: conjugative transfer and role in copper resistance. Journal of Bacteriology. https://doi.org/10.1128/jb.165.2.534-541.1986
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.