The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Role of a phenazine antibiotic from Pseudomonas fluorescens in biological control of Gaeumannomyces graminis var. tritici
Open accessAbstract
Pseudomonas fluorescens 2-79 (NRRL B-15132) and its rifampin-resistant derivative 2-79RN10 are suppressive to take-all, a major root disease of wheat caused by Gaeumannomyces graminis var. tritici. Strain 2-79 produces the antibiotic phenazine-1-carboxylate, which is active in vitro against G. graminis var. tritici and other fungal root pathogens. Mutants defective in phenazine synthesis (Phz-) were generated by Tn5 insertion and then compared with the parental strain to determine the importance of the antibiotic in take-all suppression on wheat roots. Six independent, prototrophic Phz- mutants were noninhibitory to G. graminis var. tritici in vitro and provided significantly less control of take-all than strain 2-79 on wheat seedlings. Antibiotic synthesis, fungal inhibition in vitro, and suppression of take-all on wheat were coordinately restored in two mutants complemented with cloned DNA from a 2-79 genomic library. These mutants contained Tn5 insertions in adjacent EcoRI fragments in the 2-79 genome, and the restriction maps of the region flanking the insertions and the complementary DNA were colinear. These results indicate that sequences required for phenazine production were present in the cloned DNA and support the importance of the phenazine antibiotic in disease suppression in the rhizosphere.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Bradford, M. M. (1976) · Analytical Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/0003-2697(76)90527-3 · Cited by 255,302
A rapid alkaline extraction procedure for screening recombinant plasmid DNA
Birnboim, H. C., & Doly, J. (1979) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/7.6.1513 · Cited by 14,686
Cited by
Compant, S., Clément, C., & Sessitsch, A. (2010) · Soil Biology and Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.soilbio.2009.11.024 · Cited by 2,318
Plant root-microbe communication in shaping root microbiomes
Lareen, A., Burton, F., & Schäfer, P. (2016) · Plant Molecular Biology · doi:10.1007/s11103-015-0417-8 · Cited by 668
The multifaceted roles of antibiotics and antibiotic resistance in nature
Sengupta, S., Chattopadhyay, M. K., & Grossart, H.-P. (2013) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2013.00047 · Cited by 629
Biocontrol of Soilborne Plant Pathogens.
Handelsman, J., & Stabb, E. V. (1996) · The Plant Cell · doi:10.1105/tpc.8.10.1855 · Cited by 624
Biocontrol of Rhizoctonia solani Damping-Off of Tomato with Bacillus subtilis RB14
Asaka, O., & Shoda, M. (1996) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.62.11.4081-4085.1996 · Cited by 508
Metadata
- Authors
- Thomashow, L. S., & Weller, D. M.
- Venue
- Journal of Bacteriology
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 1988-08
- Volume
- 170
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 3499-3508
- ISSN
- 0021-9193 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-5530
- OpenAlex
- W2127412245
- Cited by
- 727
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 20.99
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Role of a phenazine antibiotic from Pseudomonas fluorescens in biological control of Gaeumannomyces graminis var. tritici. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/jb.170.8.3499-3508.1988
- The paper
- Thomashow, L. S., & Weller, D. M. (1988). Role of a phenazine antibiotic from Pseudomonas fluorescens in biological control of Gaeumannomyces graminis var. tritici. Journal of Bacteriology. https://doi.org/10.1128/jb.170.8.3499-3508.1988
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.