The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Evolutionary relationships among cyanobacteria and green chloroplasts
Open accessAbstract
The 16S rRNAs from 29 cyanobacteria and the cyanelle of the phytoflagellate Cyanophora paradoxa were partially sequenced by a dideoxynucleotide-terminated, primer extension method. A least-squares distance matrix analysis was used to infer phylogenetic trees that include green chloroplasts (those of euglenoids, green algae, and higher plants). The results indicate that many diverse forms of cyanobacteria diverged within a short span of evolutionary distance. Evolutionary depth within the surveyed cyanobacteria is substantially less than that separating the major eubacterial taxa, as though cyanobacterial diversification occurred significantly after the appearance of the major eubacterial groups. Three of the five taxonomic sections defined by Rippka et al. (R. Rippka, J. Deruelles, J. B. Waterbury, M. Herdman, and R. Y. Stanier, J. Gen. Microbiol. 111:1-61, 1979) (sections II [pleurocapsalean], IV [heterocystous, filamentous, nonbranching], and V [heterocystous, filamentous, branching]) are phylogenetically coherent. However, the other two sections (I [unicellular] and III [nonheterocystous, filamentous]) are intermixed and hence are not natural groupings. Our results not only support the conclusion of previous workers that the cyanobacteria and green chloroplasts form a coherent phylogenetic group but also suggest that the chloroplast lineage, which includes the cyanelle of C. paradoxa, is not just a sister group to the free-living forms but rather is contained within the cyanobacterial radiation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Evolution of Protein Molecules
JUKES, T. H., & CANTOR, C. R. (1969) · Mammalian Protein Metabolism · doi:10.1016/b978-1-4832-3211-9.50009-7 · Cited by 11,032
Generic Assignments, Strain Histories and Properties of Pure Cultures of Cyanobacteria
Rippka, R., Stanier, R. Y., Deruelles, J., Herdman, M., & Waterbury, J. B. (1979) · Microbiology · doi:10.1099/00221287-111-1-1 · Cited by 7,606
Woese, C. R. (1987) · Microbiological Reviews · doi:10.1128/mr.51.2.221-271.1987 · Cited by 5,042
Cited by
Muyzer, G., de Waal, E. C., & Uitterlinden, A. G. (1993) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.59.3.695-700.1993 · Cited by 11,429
The Evolution of Multicellularity: A Minor Major Transition?
Grosberg, R. K., & Strathmann, R. R. (2007) · Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.36.102403.114735 · Cited by 732
The Early Evolution of Eukaryotes: A Geological Perspective
Knoll, A. H. (1992) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1585174 · Cited by 684
The Endosymbiont Hypothesis Revisited
Gray, M. W. (1992) · International Review of Cytology · doi:10.1016/s0074-7696(08)62068-9 · Cited by 586
Tomitani, A., Knoll, A. H., Cavanaugh, C. M., & Ohno, T. (2006) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0600999103 · Cited by 469
Metadata
- Authors
- Giovannoni, S. J., Turner, S., Olsen, G. J., Barns, S., Lane, D. J., & Pace, N. R.
- Venue
- Journal of Bacteriology
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 1988-08
- Volume
- 170
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 3584-3592
- ISSN
- 0021-9193 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-5530
- OpenAlex
- W1985909263
- Cited by
- 504
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 6.99
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Evolutionary relationships among cyanobacteria and green chloroplasts. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/jb.170.8.3584-3592.1988
- The paper
- Giovannoni, S. J., Turner, S., Olsen, G. J., Barns, S., Lane, D. J., & Pace, N. R. (1988). Evolutionary relationships among cyanobacteria and green chloroplasts. Journal of Bacteriology. https://doi.org/10.1128/jb.170.8.3584-3592.1988
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.