The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Correlation between ultrastructural differentiation of bacteroids and nitrogen fixation in alfalfa nodules
Open accessAbstract
Bacteroid differentiation was examined in developing and mature alfalfa nodules elicited by wild-type or Fix- mutant strains of Rhizobium meliloti. Ultrastructural studies of wild-type nodules distinguished five steps in bacteroid differentiation (types 1 to 5), each being restricted to a well-defined histological region of the nodule. Correlative studies between nodule development, bacteroid differentiation, and acetylene reduction showed that nitrogenase activity was always associated with the differentiation of the distal zone III of the nodule. In this region, the invaded cells were filled with heterogeneous type 4 bacteroids, the cytoplasm of which displayed an alternation of areas enriched with ribosomes or with DNA fibrils. Cytological studies of complementary halves of transversally sectioned mature nodules confirmed that type 4 bacteroids were always observed in the half of the nodule expressing nitrogenase activity, while the presence of type 5 bacteroids could never be correlated with acetylene reduction. Bacteria with a transposon Tn5 insertion in pSym fix genes elicited the development of Fix- nodules in which bacteroids could not develop into the last two ultrastructural types. The use of mutant strains deleted of DNA fragments bearing functional reiterated pSym fix genes and complemented with recombinant plasmids, each carrying one of these fragments, strengthened the correlation between the occurrence of type 4 bacteroids and acetylene reduction. A new nomenclature is proposed to distinguish the histological areas in alfalfa nodules which account for and are correlated with the multiple stages of bacteroid development.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
How rhizobial symbionts invade plants: the Sinorhizobium–Medicago model
Jones, K. M., Kobayashi, H., Davies, B. W., Taga, M. E., & Walker, G. C. (2007) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nrmicro1705 · Cited by 937
Mylona, P., Pawlowski, K., & Bisseling, T. (1995) · The Plant Cell · doi:10.1105/tpc.7.7.869 · Cited by 692
Oxidative Burst in Alfalfa-Sinorhizobium meliloti Symbiotic Interaction
Santos, R., Hérouart, D., Sigaud, S., Touati, D., & Puppo, A. (2001) · Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions® · doi:10.1094/mpmi.2001.14.1.86 · Cited by 323
Plet, J., Wasson, A., Ariel, F., Le Signor, C., Baker, D., Mathesius, U., Crespi, M., & Frugier, F. (2011) · The Plant Journal · doi:10.1111/j.1365-313x.2010.04447.x · Cited by 304
Journet, E.-P., El-Gachtouli, N., Vernoud, V., de Billy, F., Pichon, M., Dedieu, A., Arnould, C., Morandi, D., Barker, D. G., & Gianinazzi-Pearson, V. (2001) · Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions® · doi:10.1094/mpmi.2001.14.6.737 · Cited by 299
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Vasse, J., de Billy, F., Camut, S., & Truchet, G.
- Venue
- Journal of Bacteriology
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 1990-08
- Volume
- 172
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 4295-4306
- ISSN
- 0021-9193 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-5530
- OpenAlex
- W2153451605
- Cited by
- 597
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 17.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Correlation between ultrastructural differentiation of bacteroids and nitrogen fixation in alfalfa nodules. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/jb.172.8.4295-4306.1990
- The paper
- Vasse, J., de Billy, F., Camut, S., & Truchet, G. (1990). Correlation between ultrastructural differentiation of bacteroids and nitrogen fixation in alfalfa nodules. Journal of Bacteriology. https://doi.org/10.1128/jb.172.8.4295-4306.1990
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.