Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 377

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 13 of the 13 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The eubacterium Ectothiorhodospira halophila is negatively phototactic, with a wavelength dependence that fits the absorption spectrum of the photoactive yellow protein

Open access
Sprenger, W W, Hoff, W D, Armitage, J P, Hellingwerf, K J·1993·Journal of Bacteriology

Abstract

The motile, alkalophilic, and extremely halophilic purple sulfur bacterium Ectothiorhodospira halophila is positively photophobotactic. This response results in the accumulation of bacteria in light spots (E. Hustede, M. Liebergesell, and H. G. Schlegel, Photochem. Photobiol. 50:809-815, 1989; D. E. McRee, J. A. Tainer, T. E. Meyer, J. Van Beeumen, M. A. Cusanovich, and E. D. Getzoff, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 86:6533-6537, 1989; also, this work). In this study, we demonstrated that E. halophila is also negatively phototactic. Video analysis of free-swimming bacteria and the formation of cell distribution patterns as a result of light-color boundaries in an anaerobic suspension of cells revealed the existence of a repellent response toward intense (but nondamaging) blue light. In the presence of saturating background photosynthetic light, an increase in the intensity of blue light induced directional switches, whereas a decrease in intense blue light gave rise to suppression of these reversals. To our knowledge, this is the first report of a true repellent response to light in a free-swimming eubacterium, since the blue light response in Escherichia coli and Salmonella typhimurium (B. L. Taylor and D. E. Koshland, Jr., J. Bacteriol. 123:557-569, 1975), which requires an extremely high light intensity, is unlikely to be a sensory process. The wavelength dependence of this negative photoresponse was determined with narrow band pass interference filters. It showed similarity to the absorption spectrum of the photoactive yellow protein from E. halophila.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1128/jb.175.10.3096-3104.1993

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 13 references

Cited by

See all 377

Metadata

Authors
Sprenger, W. W., Hoff, W. D., Armitage, J. P., & Hellingwerf, K. J.
Venue
Journal of Bacteriology
Published
1993-05
Volume
175
Issue
10
Pages
3096-3104
ISSN
  • 0021-9193 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-5530
OpenAlex
W2098666958
Cited by
377
References
13
FWCI
2.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The eubacterium Ectothiorhodospira halophila is negatively phototactic, with a wavelength dependence that fits the absorption spectrum of the photoactive yellow protein. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/jb.175.10.3096-3104.1993
The paper
Sprenger, W. W., Hoff, W. D., Armitage, J. P., & Hellingwerf, K. J. (1993). The eubacterium Ectothiorhodospira halophila is negatively phototactic, with a wavelength dependence that fits the absorption spectrum of the photoactive yellow protein. Journal of Bacteriology. https://doi.org/10.1128/jb.175.10.3096-3104.1993

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.