The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Network Identification and Flux Quantification in the Central Metabolism of Saccharomyces cerevisiae under Different Conditions of Glucose Repression
Open accessAbstract
The network structure and the metabolic fluxes in central carbon metabolism were characterized in aerobically grown cells of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. The cells were grown under both high and low glucose concentrations, i.e., either in a chemostat at steady state with a specific growth rate of 0.1 h−1 or in a batch culture with a specific growth rate of 0.37 h−1. Experiments were carried out using [1-13 C]glucose as the limiting substrate, and the resulting summed fractional labelings of intracellular metabolites were measured by gas chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry. The data were used as inputs to a flux estimation routine that involved appropriate mathematical modelling of the central carbon metabolism of S. cerevisiae. The results showed that the analysis is very robust, and it was possible to quantify the fluxes in the central carbon metabolism under both growth conditions. In the batch culture, 16.2 of every 100 molecules of glucose consumed by the cells entered the pentose-phosphate pathway, whereas the same relative flux was 44.2 per 100 molecules in the chemostat. The tricarboxylic acid cycle does not operate as a cycle in batch-growing cells, in contrast to the chemostat condition. Quantitative evidence was also found for threonine aldolase and malic enzyme activities, in accordance with published data. Disruption of the MIG1 gene did not cause changes in the metabolic network structure or in the flux pattern.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The biomass objective function
Feist, A. M., & Palsson, B. O. (2010) · Current Opinion in Microbiology · doi:10.1016/j.mib.2010.03.003 · Cited by 607
Blank, L. M., Kuepfer, L., & Sauer, U. (2005) · Genome Biology · doi:10.1186/gb-2005-6-6-r49 · Cited by 317
Bacillus megaterium—from simple soil bacterium to industrial protein production host
Vary, P. S., Biedendieck, R., Fuerch, T., Meinhardt, F., Rohde, M., Deckwer, W.-D., & Jahn, D. (2007) · Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology · doi:10.1007/s00253-007-1089-3 · Cited by 260
An elementary metabolite unit (EMU) based method of isotopically nonstationary flux analysis
Young, J. D., Walther, J. L., Antoniewicz, M. R., Yoo, H., & Stephanopoulos, G. (2008) · Biotechnology and Bioengineering · doi:10.1002/bit.21632 · Cited by 255
Dijkstra, P., Thomas, S. C., Heinrich, P. L., Koch, G. W., Schwartz, E., & Hungate, B. A. (2011) · Soil Biology and Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.soilbio.2011.05.018 · Cited by 253
Metadata
- Authors
- Gombert, A. K., Moreira dos Santos, M., Christensen, B., & Nielsen, J.
- Venue
- Journal of Bacteriology
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 2001-02-15
- Volume
- 183
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1441-1451
- ISSN
- 0021-9193 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-5530
- OpenAlex
- W2086473717
- Cited by
- 348
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Network Identification and Flux Quantification in the Central Metabolism of Saccharomyces cerevisiae under Different Conditions of Glucose Repression. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/jb.183.4.1441-1451.2001
- The paper
- Gombert, A. K., Moreira dos Santos, M., Christensen, B., & Nielsen, J. (2001). Network Identification and Flux Quantification in the Central Metabolism of Saccharomyces cerevisiae under Different Conditions of Glucose Repression. Journal of Bacteriology. https://doi.org/10.1128/jb.183.4.1441-1451.2001
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.