The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Phage Proteomic Tree: a Genome-Based Taxonomy for Phage
Open accessAbstract
There are ∼10 31 phage in the biosphere, making them the most abundant biological entities on the planet. Despite their great numbers and ubiquitous presence, very little is known about phage biodiversity, biogeography, or phylogeny. Information is limited, in part, because the current ICTV taxonomical system is based on culturing phage and measuring physical parameters of the free virion. No sequence-based taxonomic systems have previously been established for phage. We present here the “Phage Proteomic Tree,” which is based on the overall similarity of 105 completely sequenced phage genomes. The Phage Proteomic Tree places phage relative to both their near neighbors and all other phage included in the analysis. This method groups phage into taxa that predicts several aspects of phage biology and highlights genetic markers that can be used for monitoring phage biodiversity. We propose that the Phage Proteomic Tree be used as the basis of a genome-based taxonomical system for phage.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Basic local alignment search tool
Altschul, S. F., Gish, W., Miller, W., Myers, E. W., & Lipman, D. J. (1990) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1006/jmbi.1990.9999 · Cited by 98,669
Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs
Altschul, S. (1997) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/25.17.3389 · Cited by 73,302
Lateral gene transfer and the nature of bacterial innovation
Ochman, H., Lawrence, J. G., & Groisman, E. A. (2000) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35012500 · Cited by 3,816
Cited by
Ecology of prokaryotic viruses
Weinbauer, M. G. (2004) · FEMS Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.femsre.2003.08.001 · Cited by 1,771
The human gut virome: inter-individual variation and dynamic response to diet
Minot, S., Sinha, R., Chen, J., Li, H., Keilbaugh, S. A., Wu, G. D., Lewis, J. D., & Bushman, F. D. (2011) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.122705.111 · Cited by 935
Here a virus, there a virus, everywhere the same virus?
Breitbart, M., & Rohwer, F. (2005) · Trends in Microbiology · doi:10.1016/j.tim.2005.04.003 · Cited by 854
Self-citationEdwards, R. A., & Rohwer, F. (2005) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nrmicro1163 · Cited by 820
Self-citationMinimum Information about an Uncultivated Virus Genome (MIUViG)
Roux, S., Adriaenssens, E. M., Dutilh, B. E., Koonin, E. V., Kropinski, A. M., Krupovic, M., Kuhn, J. H., Lavigne, R., Brister, J. R., Varsani, A., et al. (2019) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.4306 · Cited by 732
Metadata
- Authors
- Rohwer, F., & Edwards, R.
- Venue
- Journal of Bacteriology
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 2002-08-15
- Volume
- 184
- Issue
- 16
- Pages
- 4529-4535
- ISSN
- 0021-9193 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-5530
- OpenAlex
- W2154760096
- Cited by
- 605
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 19.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Phage Proteomic Tree: a Genome-Based Taxonomy for Phage. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/jb.184.16.4529-4535.2002
- The paper
- Rohwer, F., & Edwards, R. (2002). The Phage Proteomic Tree: a Genome-Based Taxonomy for Phage. Journal of Bacteriology. https://doi.org/10.1128/jb.184.16.4529-4535.2002
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
