The DOI matches its Crossref record.
In Vitro Serial Passage of Staphylococcus aureus : Changes in Physiology, Virulence Factor Production, and agr Nucleotide Sequence
Open accessAbstract
Recently, we observed that Staphylococcus aureus strains newly isolated from patients had twofold-higher aconitase activity than a strain passaged extensively in vitro, leading us to hypothesize that aconitase specific activity decreases over time during in vitro passage. To test this hypothesis, a strain recovered from a patient with toxic shock syndrome was serially passaged for 6 weeks, and the aconitase activity was measured. Aconitase specific activity decreased 38% ( P < 0.001) by the sixth week in culture. During serial passage, S. aureus existed as a heterogeneous population with two colony types that had pronounced (wild type) or negligible zones of beta-hemolytic activity. The cell density-sensing accessory gene regulatory ( agr ) system regulates beta-hemolytic activity. Surprisingly, the percentage of colonies with a wild-type beta-hemolytic phenotype correlated strongly with aconitase specific activity (ρ = 0.96), suggesting a common cause of the decreased aconitase specific activity and the variation in percentage of beta-hemolytic colonies. The loss of the beta-hemolytic phenotype also coincided with the occurrence of mutations in the agrC coding region or the intergenic region between agrC and agrA in the derivative strains. Our results demonstrate that in vitro growth is sufficient to result in mutations within the agr operon. Additionally, our results demonstrate that S. aureus undergoes significant phenotypic and genotypic changes during serial passage and suggest that vigilance should be used when extrapolating data obtained from the study of high-passage strains.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Quorum Sensing in Staphylococci
Novick, R. P., & Geisinger, E. (2008) · Annual Review of Genetics · doi:10.1146/annurev.genet.42.110807.091640 · Cited by 958
Peptide Signaling in the Staphylococci
Thoendel, M., Kavanaugh, J. S., Flack, C. E., & Horswill, A. R. (2011) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr100370n · Cited by 438
Quorum sensing in Staphylococcus infections
Yarwood, J. M., & Schlievert, P. M. (2003) · Journal of Clinical Investigation · doi:10.1172/jci200320442 · Cited by 400
Sully, E. K., Malachowa, N., Elmore, B. O., Alexander, S. M., Femling, J. K., Gray, B. M., DeLeo, F. R., Otto, M., Cheung, A. L., Edwards, B. S., et al. (2014) · PLoS Pathogens · doi:10.1371/journal.ppat.1004174 · Cited by 386
Self-citationCan laboratory reference strains mirror ‘real-world’ pathogenesis?
Fux, C. A., Shirtliff, M., Stoodley, P., & Costerton, J. W. (2005) · Trends in Microbiology · doi:10.1016/j.tim.2004.11.001 · Cited by 269
Metadata
- Authors
- Somerville, G. A., Beres, S. B., Fitzgerald, J. R., DeLeo, F. R., Cole, R. L., Hoff, J. S., & Musser, J. M.
- Venue
- Journal of Bacteriology
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 2002-03
- Volume
- 184
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1430-1437
- ISSN
- 0021-9193 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-5530
- OpenAlex
- W2075800548
- Cited by
- 178
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: In Vitro Serial Passage of Staphylococcus aureus : Changes in Physiology, Virulence Factor Production, and agr Nucleotide Sequence. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/jb.184.5.1430-1437.2002
- The paper
- Somerville, G. A., Beres, S. B., Fitzgerald, J. R., DeLeo, F. R., Cole, R. L., Hoff, J. S., & Musser, J. M. (2002). In Vitro Serial Passage of Staphylococcus aureus : Changes in Physiology, Virulence Factor Production, and agr Nucleotide Sequence. Journal of Bacteriology. https://doi.org/10.1128/jb.184.5.1430-1437.2002
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.