The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Staphylococcus aureus cidAB Operon: Evaluation of Its Role in Regulation of Murein Hydrolase Activity and Penicillin Tolerance
Open accessAbstract
Recent studies have shown that expression of the Staphylococcus aureus lrgAB operon inhibits murein hydrolase activity and decreases sensitivity to penicillin-induced killing. It was proposed that the lrgAB gene products function in a manner analogous to an antiholin, inhibiting a putative holin from transporting murein hydrolases out of the cell. In the present study the cidAB operon was identified and characterized based on the similarity of the cidA and cidB gene products to the products of the lrgAB operon. Zymographic and quantitative analyses of murein hydrolase activity revealed that mutation of the cidA gene results in decreased extracellular murein hydrolase activity compared to that of S . aureus RN6390, the parental strain. Complementation of cidA expression restored the wild-type phenotype, indicating that expression of the cidAB operon has a positive influence on extracellular murein hydrolase activity. The cidA mutant also displayed a significant decrease in sensitivity to the killing effects of penicillin. However, complementation of the cidA defect did not restore penicillin sensitivity to wild-type levels. Reverse transcriptase PCR also revealed that cidAB is maximally expressed during early exponential growth, opposite of what was previously observed for lrgAB expression. Based on these results, we propose that the cidAB operon encodes the holin-like counterpart of the lrgAB operon and acts in a manner opposite from that of lrgAB by increasing extracellular murein hydrolase activity and increasing sensitivity to penicillin-induced killing.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“cidA mediated cell lysis contributes to S. aureus biofilm formation in vivo and in vitro [80].”
From A Review of Biofilm Formation of Staphylococcus aureus and Its Regulation Mechanism (2022) · cites this paper as [80]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Arciola, C. R., Campoccia, D., Speziale, P., Montanaro, L., & Costerton, J. W. (2012) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.05.031 · Cited by 1,047
A Review of Biofilm Formation of Staphylococcus aureus and Its Regulation Mechanism
Peng, Q., Tang, X., Dong, W., Sun, N., & Yuan, W. (2022) · Antibiotics · doi:10.3390/antibiotics12010012 · Cited by 440
The biological role of death and lysis in biofilm development
Bayles, K. W. (2007) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nrmicro1743 · Cited by 377
Self-citationMolecular control of bacterial death and lysis
Rice, K. C., & Bayles, K. W. (2008) · Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews · doi:10.1128/mmbr.00030-07 · Cited by 362
Bacterial programmed cell death: making sense of a paradox
Bayles, K. W. (2014) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nrmicro3136 · Cited by 315
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Rice, K. C., Firek, B. A., Nelson, J. B., Yang, S.-J., Patton, T. G., & Bayles, K. W.
- Venue
- Journal of Bacteriology
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 2003-04-15
- Volume
- 185
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 2635-2643
- ISSN
- 0021-9193 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-5530
- OpenAlex
- W2120160920
- Cited by
- 170
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Staphylococcus aureus cidAB Operon: Evaluation of Its Role in Regulation of Murein Hydrolase Activity and Penicillin Tolerance. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/jb.185.8.2635-2643.2003
- The paper
- Rice, K. C., Firek, B. A., Nelson, J. B., Yang, S.-J., Patton, T. G., & Bayles, K. W. (2003). The Staphylococcus aureus cidAB Operon: Evaluation of Its Role in Regulation of Murein Hydrolase Activity and Penicillin Tolerance. Journal of Bacteriology. https://doi.org/10.1128/jb.185.8.2635-2643.2003
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.