The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Effect of Mild Acid on Gene Expression in Staphylococcus aureus
Open accessAbstract
During staphylococcal growth in glucose-supplemented medium, the pH of a culture starting near neutrality typically decreases by about 2 units due to the fermentation of glucose. Many species can comfortably tolerate the resulting mildly acidic conditions (pH, ∼5.5) by mounting a cellular response, which serves to defend the intracellular pH and, in principle, to modify gene expression for optimal performance in a mildly acidic infection site. In this report, we show that changes in staphylococcal gene expression formerly thought to represent a glucose effect are largely the result of declining pH. We examine the cellular response to mild acid by microarray analysis and define the affected gene set as the mild acid stimulon. Many of the genes encoding extracellular virulence factors are affected, as are genes involved in regulation of virulence factor gene expression, transport of sugars and peptides, intermediary metabolism, and pH homeostasis. Key results are verified by gene fusion and Northern blot hybridization analyses. The results point to, but do not define, possible regulatory pathways by which the organism senses and responds to a pH stimulus.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Biofilms: Survival Mechanisms of Clinically Relevant Microorganisms
Donlan, R. M., & Costerton, J. W. (2002) · Clinical Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1128/cmr.15.2.167-193.2002 · Cited by 6,644
Cited by
Diep, B. A., Gill, S. R., Chang, R. F., Phan, T. H., Chen, J. H., Davidson, M. G., Lin, F., Lin, J., Carleton, H. A., Mongodin, E. F., et al. (2006) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(06)68231-7 · Cited by 1,633
agr-Mediated Dispersal of Staphylococcus aureus Biofilms
Boles, B. R., & Horswill, A. R. (2008) · PLoS Pathogens · doi:10.1371/journal.ppat.1000052 · Cited by 963
Insights into the mode of action of chitosan as an antibacterial compound.
Raafat, D., von Bargen, K., Haas, A., & Sahl, H.-G. (2008) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.00453-08 · Cited by 888
Regulation of Staphylococcus aureus Virulence
Jenul, C., & Horswill, A. R. (2019) · Microbiology Spectrum · doi:10.1128/microbiolspec.gpp3-0031-2018 · Cited by 549
Peptide Signaling in the Staphylococci
Thoendel, M., Kavanaugh, J. S., Flack, C. E., & Horswill, A. R. (2011) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr100370n · Cited by 438
Metadata
- Authors
- Weinrick, B., Dunman, P. M., McAleese, F., Murphy, E., Projan, S. J., Fang, Y., & Novick, R. P.
- Venue
- Journal of Bacteriology
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 2004-12-15
- Volume
- 186
- Issue
- 24
- Pages
- 8407-8423
- ISSN
- 0021-9193 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-5530
- OpenAlex
- W2089388387
- Cited by
- 203
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 4.55
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Effect of Mild Acid on Gene Expression in Staphylococcus aureus. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/jb.186.24.8407-8423.2004
- The paper
- Weinrick, B., Dunman, P. M., McAleese, F., Murphy, E., Projan, S. J., Fang, Y., & Novick, R. P. (2004). Effect of Mild Acid on Gene Expression in Staphylococcus aureus. Journal of Bacteriology. https://doi.org/10.1128/jb.186.24.8407-8423.2004
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.