The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Biofilm Formation and Sloughing in Serratia marcescens Are Controlled by Quorum Sensing and Nutrient Cues
Open accessAbstract
We describe here a role for quorum sensing in the detachment, or sloughing, of Serratia marcescens filamentous biofilms, and we show that nutrient conditions affect the biofilm morphotype. Under reduced carbon or nitrogen conditions,S. marcescens formed a classical biofilm consisting of microcolonies. The filamentous biofilm could be converted to a microcolony-type biofilm by switching the medium after establishment of the biofilm. Similarly, when initially grown as a microcolony biofilm,S. marcescens could be converted back to a filamentous biofilm by increasing the nutrient composition. Under high-nutrient conditions, an N-acyl homoserine lactone quorum-sensing mutant formed biofilms that were indistinguishable from the wild-type biofilms. Similarly, other quorum-sensing-dependent behaviors, such as swarming motility, could be rendered quorum sensing independent by manipulating the growth medium. Quorum sensing was also found to be involved in the sloughing of the filamentous biofilm. The biofilm formed by the bacterium consistently sloughed from the substratum after approximately 75 to 80 h of development. The quorum-sensing mutant, when supplemented with exogenous signal, formed a wild-type filamentous biofilm and sloughed at the same time as the wild type, and this was independent of surfactant production. When we removed the signal from the quorum-sensing mutant prior to the time of sloughing, the biofilm did not undergo significant detachment. Together, the data suggest that biofilm formation by S. marcescens is a dynamic process that is controlled by both nutrient cues and the quorum-sensing system.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Involvement of Cell-to-Cell Signals in the Development of a Bacterial Biofilm
Davies, D. G., Parsek, M. R., Pearson, J. P., Iglewski, B. H., Costerton, J. W., & Greenberg, E. P. (1998) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.280.5361.295 · Cited by 3,396
Cited by
Signals, Regulatory Networks, and Materials That Build and Break Bacterial Biofilms
Karatan, E., & Watnick, P. (2009) · Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews · doi:10.1128/mmbr.00041-08 · Cited by 1,048
agr-Mediated Dispersal of Staphylococcus aureus Biofilms
Boles, B. R., & Horswill, A. R. (2008) · PLoS Pathogens · doi:10.1371/journal.ppat.1000052 · Cited by 963
Biofilm Dispersal: Mechanisms, Clinical Implications, and Potential Therapeutic Uses
Kaplan, J. B. (2010) · Journal of Dental Research · doi:10.1177/0022034509359403 · Cited by 949
Should we stay or should we go: mechanisms and ecological consequences for biofilm dispersal
McDougald, D., Rice, S. A., Barraud, N., Steinberg, P. D., & Kjelleberg, S. (2012) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nrmicro2695 · Cited by 881
Self-citationQuorum sensing and bacterial biofilms
Dickschat, J. S. (2010) · Natural Product Reports · doi:10.1039/b804469b · Cited by 355
Metadata
- Authors
- Rice, S. A., Koh, K. S., Queck, S. Y., Labbate, M., Lam, K. W., & Kjelleberg, S.
- Venue
- Journal of Bacteriology
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 2005-05-15
- Volume
- 187
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 3477-3485
- ISSN
- 0021-9193 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-5530
- OpenAlex
- W2114447433
- Cited by
- 282
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 5.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Biofilm Formation and Sloughing in Serratia marcescens Are Controlled by Quorum Sensing and Nutrient Cues. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/jb.187.10.3477-3485.2005
- The paper
- Rice, S. A., Koh, K. S., Queck, S. Y., Labbate, M., Lam, K. W., & Kjelleberg, S. (2005). Biofilm Formation and Sloughing in Serratia marcescens Are Controlled by Quorum Sensing and Nutrient Cues. Journal of Bacteriology. https://doi.org/10.1128/jb.187.10.3477-3485.2005
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.