The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Experimental Identification and Quantification of Glucose Metabolism in Seven Bacterial Species
Open accessAbstract
The structurally conserved and ubiquitous pathways of central carbon metabolism provide building blocks and cofactors for the biosynthesis of cellular macromolecules. The relative uses of pathways and reactions, however, vary widely among species and depend upon conditions, and some are not used at all. Here we identify the network topology of glucose metabolism and its in vivo operation by quantification of intracellular carbon fluxes from 13 C tracer experiments. Specifically, we investigated Agrobacterium tumefaciens , two pseudomonads, Sinorhizobium meliloti , Rhodobacter sphaeroides , Zymomonas mobilis , and Paracoccus versutus , which grow on glucose as the sole carbon source, represent fundamentally different metabolic lifestyles (aerobic, anaerobic, photoheterotrophic, and chemoheterotrophic), and are phylogenetically distinct (firmicutes, γ-proteobacteria, and α-proteobacteria). Compared to those of the model bacteria Escherichia coli and Bacillus subtilis , metabolisms of the investigated species differed significantly in several respects: (i) the Entner-Doudoroff pathway was the almost exclusive catabolic route; (ii) the pentose phosphate pathway exhibited exclusively biosynthetic functions, in many cases also requiring flux through the nonoxidative branch; (iii) all aerobes exhibited fully respiratory metabolism without significant overflow metabolism; and (iv) all aerobes used the pyruvate bypass of the malate dehydrogenase reaction to a significant extent. Exclusively, Pseudomonas fluorescens converted most glucose extracellularly to gluconate and 2-ketogluconate. Overall, the results suggest that metabolic data from model species with extensive industrial and laboratory history are not representative of microbial metabolism, at least not quantitatively.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The Moderately Efficient Enzyme: Evolutionary and Physicochemical Trends Shaping Enzyme Parameters
Bar-Even, A., Noor, E., Savir, Y., Liebermeister, W., Davidi, D., Tawfik, D. S., & Milo, R. (2011) · Biochemistry · doi:10.1021/bi2002289 · Cited by 1,050
Transport and Metabolism in Legume-Rhizobia Symbioses
Udvardi, M., & Poole, P. S. (2013) · Annual Review of Plant Biology · doi:10.1146/annurev-arplant-050312-120235 · Cited by 890
Glycolytic strategy as a tradeoff between energy yield and protein cost
Flamholz, A., Noor, E., Bar-Even, A., Liebermeister, W., & Milo, R. (2013) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1215283110 · Cited by 531
Multidimensional Optimality of Microbial Metabolism
Schuetz, R., Zamboni, N., Zampieri, M., Heinemann, M., & Sauer, U. (2012) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1216882 · Cited by 420
Self-citationBiotechnological domestication of pseudomonads using synthetic biology
Nikel, P. I., Martínez-García, E., & de Lorenzo, V. (2014) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nrmicro3253 · Cited by 381
Metadata
- Authors
- Fuhrer, T., Fischer, E., & Sauer, U.
- Venue
- Journal of Bacteriology
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 2005-03
- Volume
- 187
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1581-1590
- ISSN
- 0021-9193 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-5530
- OpenAlex
- W2159379185
- Cited by
- 393
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Experimental Identification and Quantification of Glucose Metabolism in Seven Bacterial Species. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/jb.187.5.1581-1590.2005
- The paper
- Fuhrer, T., Fischer, E., & Sauer, U. (2005). Experimental Identification and Quantification of Glucose Metabolism in Seven Bacterial Species. Journal of Bacteriology. https://doi.org/10.1128/jb.187.5.1581-1590.2005
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.