The DOI matches its Crossref record.
ANTIGENIC STUDIES OF CANDIDA: I. Observation of Two Antigenic Groups in Candida albicans
Open accessAbstract
Hasenclever , H. F. (U. S. Public Health Service, Bethesda, Md.), and William O. Mitchell . Antigenic studies of Candida. I. Observations of two antigenic groups in Candida albicans . J. Bacteriol. 82: 570–573. 1961.—Two distinct antigenic groups, detected by tube agglutination, have been observed among strains of Candida albicans . Adsorption of an antiserum with a heterologous strain did not remove the agglutinating properties for the homologous strain. Homologous adsorption of the antiserum did remove its agglutinating properties. Seventy-one isolates of C. albicans have been screened with this adsorbed antiserum and 38 were agglutinated at a serum dilution of 1:240 to 1:480 (group A), whereas 33 were not agglutinated at a serum dilution of 1:30 (group B). Thirty-five of the strains were studied with rabbit antisera prepared against each of six strains (three from each group). Agglutination reactions of these strains with samples of each antiserum adsorbed individually with each immunizing strain verified the results of the screening agglutination reactions. All the agglutinating properties of antisera prepared against the three group B strains were removed by adsorption with suspensions of either group A or group B strains. The identity of all isolates used in this study was confirmed by chlamydospore formation, fermentation, and carbohydrate assimilation reactions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Lee, K. L., Buckley, H. R., & Campbell, C. C. (1975) · Medical Mycology · doi:10.1080/00362177585190271 · Cited by 788
Adherence and receptor relationships of Candida albicans
Calderone, R. A., & Braun, P. C. (1991) · Microbiological Reviews · doi:10.1128/mr.55.1.1-20.1991 · Cited by 427
Cell Envelope of Candida Albicans
Shepherd, M. G. (1987) · CRC Critical Reviews in Microbiology · doi:10.3109/10408418709104445 · Cited by 137
Fungicidal monoclonal antibody C7 interferes with iron acquisition in Candida albicans
Brena, S., Cabezas-Olcoz, J., Moragues, M. D., Fernández de Larrinoa, I., Domínguez, A., Quindós, G., & Pontón, J. (2011) · Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy · doi:10.1128/aac.00892-10 · Cited by 69
Metadata
- Authors
- Hasenclever, H. F., & Mitchell, W. O.
- Venue
- Journal of Bacteriology
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 1961-10
- Volume
- 82
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 570-573
- ISSN
- 0021-9193 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-5530
- OpenAlex
- W2144211063
- Cited by
- 273
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 18.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: ANTIGENIC STUDIES OF CANDIDA: I. Observation of Two Antigenic Groups in Candida albicans. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/jb.82.4.570-573.1961
- The paper
- Hasenclever, H. F., & Mitchell, W. O. (1961). ANTIGENIC STUDIES OF CANDIDA: I. Observation of Two Antigenic Groups in Candida albicans. Journal of Bacteriology. https://doi.org/10.1128/jb.82.4.570-573.1961
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.