Cited by 70Probiotics and Fermented FoodsBacterial Identification and Susceptibility TestingActinomycetales infections and treatment

Cultural Characteristics and Fatty Acid Composition of Propionibacteria

Open access
Moss, C. Wayne, Dowell, V. R., Farshtchi, D., Raines, L. J., Cherry, W. B.·1969·Journal of Bacteriology

Abstract

The cultural characteristics and cellular fatty acid composition of 40 strains representing 7 species of Propionibacterium and of 9 cultures of anaerobic corynebacteria were studied. The cultures were characterized by means of 23 separate cultural and biochemical tests. Cultures of the two genera differed consistently in only two reactions; the propionibacteria did not produce indole or liquefy gelatin, whereas the anaerobic corynebacteria were consistently positive with these tests. The fatty acids were extracted from whole cells and examined as methyl esters by gas-liquid chromatography. The most abundant acid in the seven Propionibacterium species was a C 15 -saturated branched-chain acid which was present in both the iso-and anteiso-form. Based on a comparison of the relative abundance of these isomers (i-C 15 and a-C 15 ), the species were separated into two groups. P. freudenreichii and P. shermanii (group one) were similar and contained the a-C 15 isomer as the predominant acid. The i-C 15 isomer was the most abundant acid in the second group ( P. arabinosum, P. jensenii, P. pentosaceum, P. thoenii , and P. zeae ). The fatty acid profiles of the anaerobic corynebacteria were somewhat similar to those of the second group of propionibacteria, but were distinct from the profiles of P. freudenreichii and P. shermanii . The addition of branched-chain amino acids ( l -leucine and l -isoleucine) to the growth medium increased the synthesis of the specific fatty acid(s) structurally related to the added amino acid.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1128/jb.97.2.561-570.1969

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Authors
Moss, C. W., Dowell, V. R., Farshtchi, D., Raines, L. J., & Cherry, W. B.
Affiliations
National Communicable Disease Center, Atlanta, Georgia 30333
Venue
Journal of Bacteriology
Published
1969-02
Volume
97
Issue
2
Pages
561-570
ISSN
  • 0021-9193 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-5530
OpenAlex
W1525447706
Cited by
70
References
0
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 3 · 2012: 1
FWCI
14.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Bacteriology (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Probiotics and Fermented Foods
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Clinical Biochemistry › Bacterial Identification and Susceptibility Testing
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Microbiology › Actinomycetales infections and treatment
Keywords
Propionibacterium, fatty acid composition, branched-chain fatty acids, bacterial culture characteristics, biochemical identification, Propionibacterium freudenreichii, Propionibacterium shermanii, branched-chain amino acids, leucine, isoleucine, fatty acid synthesis
MeSH terms
Bacteriological Techniques, Chromatography, Gas, Corynebacterium, Culture Media, Fatty Acids, Isoleucine, Leucine, Propionibacterium

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review