Use of Anidulafungin as a Surrogate Marker To Predict Susceptibility and Resistance to Caspofungin among 4,290 Clinical Isolates of Candida by Using CLSI Methods and Interpretive Criteria
Abstract
ABSTRACT This study addressed the application of anidulafungin as a surrogate marker to predict the susceptibility of Candida to caspofungin due to unacceptably high interlaboratory variation of caspofungin MIC values. CLSI reference broth microdilution methods and species-specific interpretive criteria were used to test 4,290 strains of Candida (eight species), including 71 strains with documentedfksmutations. Caspofungin MIC values were compared with those of anidulafungin to determine the percentage of categorical agreement (CA) and very major (VME), major (ME), and minor error rates, as well as the ability to detectfksmutants. For all 4,290 isolates the CA was 97.1% (0.2% VME and ME, 2.5% minor errors) using anidulafungin as the surrogate. Among the 62 isolates of Candida albicans (4 isolates), C. tropicalis (5 isolates), C. krusei (4 isolates), C. kefyr (2 isolates), and C. glabrata (47 isolates) that were nonsusceptible (NS; either intermediate [I] or resistant [R]) to both caspofungin and anidulafungin, 52 (83.8%) contained a mutation infks1orfks2. Eight mutants of C. glabrata , two of C. albicans , and one each of C. tropicalis and C. krusei were classified as susceptible (S) to both antifungal agents. The remaining 7 mutants (2 C. albicans and 5 C. glabrata ) were susceptible to one of the agents and either intermediate or resistant to the other. Using the epidemiological cutoff value (ECV) of 0.12 μg/ml for both caspofungin and anidulafungin to differentiate wild-type (WT) from non-WT strains of C. glabrata , 42 of the 55 (76.4%) C. glabrata mutants were non-WT and 8 of the 55 (14.5%) were WT for both agents (90.9% concordance). Anidulafungin can accurately serve as a surrogate marker to predict S and R of Candida to caspofungin.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 35 · Cited by 51
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- [15]15. Arendrup MC, Rodriguez-Tudela JL, Park S, Garcia-Effron G, Delmas G, Cuenca-Estrella M, Gomez-Lopez A, Perlin DS. 2011. Echinocandin susceptibility testing of Candida spp. using EUCAST EDef 7.1 andCLSIM27-A3standardprocedures:analysis of the influence of bovine serumalbuminsupplementation,storage time, and drug lots. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 55: 1580-1587. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/AAC.01364 -10. · DOI
- [24]24. Perlin DS. 2011. Echinocandin-resistant Candida: molecular methods andphenotypes. Curr. Fungal Infect. Rep. 5: 113-119. http://dx.doi.org/10 .1007/s12281-011-0054-x.
- [26]26. Ferraro MJ, Jorgensen JH. 1995. Instrument-based antibacterial susceptibility testing, p 1379 -1384. In MurrayPR,BaronEJ,Pfaller MA, Tenover FC, Yolken RH (ed), Manual of clinical microbiology, 6th ed. ASM Press, Washington, DC.
- Authors
- Pfaller, M. A., Diekema, D. J., Jones, R. N., & Castanheira, M.
- Affiliations
- University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics (US)
- JMI Laboratories (US)
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Microbiology
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 2014-09
- Volume
- 52
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 3223-3229
- ISSN
- 0095-1137 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-660X
- OpenAlex
- W4245165711
- Cited by
- 51
- References
- 35
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 3
- FWCI
- 6.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Clinical Microbiology (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Pfizer
- Astellas Pharma
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Antifungal resistance and susceptibility
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Fungal Plant Pathogen Control
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Yeasts and Rust Fungi Studies
- Keywords
- anidulafungin, caspofungin, Candida, surrogate markers, antifungal susceptibility, caspofungin resistance, Candida glabrata, Candida albicans, Candida tropicalis, Candida krusei, Candida kefyr, epidemiological cut-off values, inter-laboratory variability, antifungal susceptibility testing, categorical agreement
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review