Cited by 127Antimicrobial Resistance in StaphylococcusAntibiotic Resistance in BacteriaBacterial Genetics and Biotechnology

Impact of rpoB Mutations on Reduced Vancomycin Susceptibility in Staphylococcus aureus

Open access
Watanabe, Yukiko, Cui, Longzhu, Katayama, Yuki, Kozue, Kishii, Hiramatsu, Keiichi·2011·Journal of Clinical Microbiology

Abstract

Of 38 vancomycin-intermediate Staphylococcus aureus (VISA) clinical strains, 27 (71%) possessed a mutation(s) in rpoB encoding the β-subunit of RNA polymerase. Furthermore, 95.6% of the rifampin-resistant mutants obtained from 9 methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) clinical isolates showed decreased vancomycin susceptibilities. These data indicate the involvement of an rpoB mutation in VISA phenotype expression.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1128/jcm.02144-10

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Another change frequently associated with the VISA phenotype is mutations in rpoB (encoding the B subunit of the RNA polymerase).

    “Apart from the above regulatory systems, another change that has been frequently associated with the VISA phenotype is mutations in rpoB (encoding the B subunit of the RNA polymerase).”

    From Mechanisms of Antibiotic Resistance (2016) · cites this paper as [105]

  • Watanabe et al. analyzed 38 VISA isolates from 10 different countries and demonstrated that mutations in the rpoB gene were present in the majority (71%) of the isolates.

    “Indeed, Watanabe et al. analyzed 38 VISA isolates from 10 different countries and demonstrated that mutations in the rpoB gene were present in the majority (71%) of the isolates (105).”

    From Mechanisms of Antibiotic Resistance (2016) · cites this paper as [105]

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 22 · Cited by 127

Authors
Watanabe, Y., Cui, L., Katayama, Y., Kozue, K., & Hiramatsu, K.
Affiliations
  • Department of Infection Control Science, Graduate School of Medicine
  • Juntendo University (JP)
Corresponding author
Hiramatsu, Keiichi
Venue
Journal of Clinical Microbiology
Published
2011-07
Volume
49
Issue
7
Pages
2680-2684
ISSN
  • 0095-1137 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-660X
OpenAlex
W2167909654
Cited by
127
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 11
FWCI
7.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Clinical Microbiology (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Antimicrobial Resistance in Staphylococcus
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Medicine › Antibiotic Resistance in Bacteria
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Bacterial Genetics and Biotechnology
Keywords
rpoB mutations, vancomycin-intermediate Staphylococcus aureus, vancomycin resistance, RNA polymerase beta subunit, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, rifampicin resistance, reduced vancomycin susceptibility, antibiotic resistance genes
MeSH terms
Humans, Microbial Sensitivity Tests, DNA-Directed RNA Polymerases, Staphylococcal Infections, Staphylococcus aureus, Vancomycin, Mutation, Missense, Vancomycin Resistance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review