The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Association between Methicillin Susceptibility and Biofilm Regulation in Staphylococcus aureus Isolates from Device-Related Infections
Open accessAbstract
Production of icaADBC -encoded polysaccharide intercellular adhesin, or poly- N -acetylglucosamine (PIA/PNAG), represents an important biofilm mechanism in staphylococci. We previously described a glucose-induced, ica -independent biofilm mechanism in four methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) isolates. Here, biofilm regulation by NaCl and glucose was characterized in 114 MRSA and 98 methicillin-sensitive S. aureus (MSSA) isolates from diagnosed device-related infections. NaCl-induced biofilm development was significantly more prevalent among MSSA than MRSA isolates, and this association was independent of the isolate's genetic background as assessed by spa sequence typing. Among MSSA isolates, PIA/PNAG production correlated with biofilm development in NaCl, whereas in MRSA isolates grown in NaCl or glucose, PIA/PNAG production was not detected even though icaADBC was transcribed and regulated. Glucose-induced biofilm in MRSA was ica independent and apparently mediated by a protein adhesin(s). Experiments performed with strains that were amenable to genetic manipulation revealed that deletion of icaADBC had no effect on biofilm in a further six MRSA isolates but abolished biofilm in four MSSA isolates. Mutation of sarA abolished biofilm in seven MRSA and eight MSSA isolates. In contrast, mutation of agr in 13 MRSA and 8 MSSA isolates substantially increased biofilm (more than twofold) in only 5 of 21 (23%) isolates and had no significant impact on biofilm in the remaining 16 isolates. We conclude that biofilm development in MRSA is ica independent and involves a protein adhesin(s) regulated by SarA and Agr, whereas SarA-regulated PIA/PNAG plays a more important role in MSSA biofilm development.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Some studies reveal that the strains without ica operon can also form biofilm [51,52].”
From A Review of Biofilm Formation of Staphylococcus aureus and Its Regulation Mechanism (2022) · cites this paper as [51]
In the citing paper
“This indicates that there are proteins involved in biofilm formation through other mechanisms independent of the ica operon.”
From A Review of Biofilm Formation of Staphylococcus aureus and Its Regulation Mechanism (2022) · cites this paper as [51]
In the citing paper
“Among the strains forming biofilm, the mutation of the ica gene does not affect the formation of biofilm. When treated with proteases, the biofilm of these strains can be depolymerized [51].”
From A Review of Biofilm Formation of Staphylococcus aureus and Its Regulation Mechanism (2022) · cites this paper as [51]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Tong, S. Y. C., Davis, J. S., Eichenberger, E., Holland, T. L., & Fowler, V. G. (2015) · Clinical Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1128/cmr.00134-14 · Cited by 5,192
Staphylococcus aureus biofilms: Properties, regulation, and roles in human disease
Archer, N. K., Mazaitis, M. J., Costerton, J. W., Leid, J. G., Powers, M. E., & Shirtliff, M. E. (2011) · Virulence · doi:10.4161/viru.2.5.17724 · Cited by 1,018
agr-Mediated Dispersal of Staphylococcus aureus Biofilms
Boles, B. R., & Horswill, A. R. (2008) · PLoS Pathogens · doi:10.1371/journal.ppat.1000052 · Cited by 963
Hobley, L., Harkins, C., MacPhee, C. E., & Stanley-Wall, N. R. (2015) · FEMS Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1093/femsre/fuv015 · Cited by 581
A Review of Biofilm Formation of Staphylococcus aureus and Its Regulation Mechanism
Peng, Q., Tang, X., Dong, W., Sun, N., & Yuan, W. (2022) · Antibiotics · doi:10.3390/antibiotics12010012 · Cited by 440
Metadata
- Authors
- O'Neill, E., Pozzi, C., Houston, P., Smyth, D., Humphreys, H., Robinson, D. A., & O'Gara, J. P.
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Microbiology
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 2007-05
- Volume
- 45
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1379-1388
- ISSN
- 0095-1137 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-660X
- OpenAlex
- W2098785211
- Cited by
- 349
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 8.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Association between Methicillin Susceptibility and Biofilm Regulation in Staphylococcus aureus Isolates from Device-Related Infections. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/jcm.02280-06
- The paper
- O'Neill, E., Pozzi, C., Houston, P., Smyth, D., Humphreys, H., Robinson, D. A., & O'Gara, J. P. (2007). Association between Methicillin Susceptibility and Biofilm Regulation in Staphylococcus aureus Isolates from Device-Related Infections. Journal of Clinical Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1128/jcm.02280-06
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.