The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Comparison of Western blot (immunoblot) and glycoprotein G-specific immunodot enzyme assay for detecting antibodies to herpes simplex virus types 1 and 2 in human sera
Open accessAbstract
Sera from patients with culture-proven genital herpes infections were tested for herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1)- and HSV-2-specific antibodies by both a Western blot (immunoblot) technique (WBA) and immunodot enzyme assays (IEAs) specific for HSV-1 or HSV-2 glycoprotein G (gG). Of 137 serum samples tested, none was mistyped by either WBA or IEA. Both tests were most sensitive with sera obtained at least 21 days after onset of primary HSV-2 infections or sera drawn during recurrent HSV-2 genital episodes: 75 of 76 (99%) such serum samples were positive for HSV-2 antibody by WBA and 73 of 76 (96%) were positive by IEA. Of sera drawn earlier than 21 days from onset of primary genital HSV-2, antibodies to HSV-2 were detected in 25% by WBA and 8% by IEA. In patients with culture-proven primary genital HSV-1 infection, WBA detected antibodies to HSV-1 proteins in 16 of 17 (94%) serum samples drawn at least 21 days after onset of primary genital HSV-1 infection, compared with 9 of 17 (53%) serum samples tested for gG-1 by IEA. Both WBA and IEA are accurate and sensitive tests for HSV-2 antibody in patients convalescing from a first episode or having symptomatic or asymptomatic recurrent genital herpes. WBA was more sensitive than IEA in detecting seroconversion following primary HSV-1 genital herpes, although both assays may miss persons undergoing early seroconversion to HSV-2.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Brown, Z. A., Wald, A., Morrow, R. A., Selke, S., Zeh, J., & Corey, L. (2003) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.289.2.203 · Cited by 679
Self-citationMontaner, J. S., Hogg, R., Wood, E., Kerr, T., Tyndall, M., Levy, A. R., & Harrigan, P. R. (2006) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(06)69162-9 · Cited by 555
Brown, Z. A., Benedetti, J., Ashley, R., Burchett, S., Selke, S., Berry, S., Vontver, L. A., & Corey, L. (1991) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199105023241804 · Cited by 473
Self-citationCelum, C., Wald, A., Hughes, J., Sanchez, J., Reid, S., Delany-Moretlwe, S., Cowan, F., Casapia, M., Ortiz, A., Fuchs, J., et al. (2008) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(08)60920-4 · Cited by 449
Self-citationRegression of low-grade squamous intra-epithelial lesions in young women
Moscicki, A.-B., Shiboski, S., Hills, N. K., Powell, K. J., Jay, N., Hanson, E. N., Miller, S., Canjura-Clayton, L. K., Farhat, S., Broering, J. M., et al. (2004) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(04)17354-6 · Cited by 448
Metadata
- Authors
- Ashley, R. L., Militoni, J., Lee, F., Nahmias, A., & Corey, L.
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Microbiology
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 1988-04
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 662-667
- ISSN
- 0095-1137 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-660X
- OpenAlex
- W1921524964
- Cited by
- 541
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Comparison of Western blot (immunoblot) and glycoprotein G-specific immunodot enzyme assay for detecting antibodies to herpes simplex virus types 1 and 2 in human sera. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/jcm.26.4.662-667.1988
- The paper
- Ashley, R. L., Militoni, J., Lee, F., Nahmias, A., & Corey, L. (1988). Comparison of Western blot (immunoblot) and glycoprotein G-specific immunodot enzyme assay for detecting antibodies to herpes simplex virus types 1 and 2 in human sera. Journal of Clinical Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1128/jcm.26.4.662-667.1988
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.