The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Recovery of resistant enterococci during vancomycin prophylaxis
Open accessAbstract
We report a case of a patient undergoing hemodialysis who developed a wound infection and subsequently bacteremia with a strain of vancomycin-resistant enterococcus identified as Enterococcus gallinarum. He had been receiving vancomycin prophylaxis before developing these infections. Both isolates were susceptible to ampicillin, rifampin, teicoplanin, and daptomycin (LY146032).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The life and times of the Enterococcus
Murray, B. E. (1990) · Clinical Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1128/cmr.3.1.46 · Cited by 1,908
Lactic acid bacteria and human clinical infection
Aguirre, M., & Collins, M. D. (1993) · Journal of Applied Bacteriology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2672.1993.tb02753.x · Cited by 425
New Directions in Antibacterial Research
Chu, D. T. W., Plattner, J. J., & Katz, L. (1996) · Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jm960294s · Cited by 298
Metadata
- Authors
- Kaplan, A. H., Gilligan, P. H., & Facklam, R. R.
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Microbiology
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 1988-06
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1216-1218
- ISSN
- 0095-1137 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-660X
- OpenAlex
- W2131506094
- Cited by
- 166
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 9.80
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Recovery of resistant enterococci during vancomycin prophylaxis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/jcm.26.6.1216-1218.1988
- The paper
- Kaplan, A. H., Gilligan, P. H., & Facklam, R. R. (1988). Recovery of resistant enterococci during vancomycin prophylaxis. Journal of Clinical Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1128/jcm.26.6.1216-1218.1988
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
