The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Amplification of bacterial 16S ribosomal DNA with polymerase chain reaction
Open accessAbstract
The sequence of small-subunit rRNA varies in an orderly manner across phylogenetic lines and contains segments that are conserved at the species, genus, or kingdom level. By directing oligonucleotide primers at sequences conserved throughout the eubacterial kingdom, we amplified bacterial 16S ribosomal DNA sequences with the polymerase chain reaction. Priming sites were located at the extreme 5' end, the extreme 3' end, and the center of 16S ribosomal DNA. The isolates tested with these primers included members of the genera Staphylococcus, Coxiella, Rickettsia, Clostridium, Neisseria, Mycobacterium, Bilophila, Eubacterium, Fusobacterium, and Lactobacillus and the family Enterobacteriaceae. Initially, the yields from the reactions were erratic because the primers were self-complementary at the 3' ends. Revised primers that were not self-complementary gave more reproducible results. With the latter primers, 0.4 pg of Escherichia coli DNA consistently gave a visible band after amplification. This method should be useful for increasing the amounts of bacterial 16S ribosomal DNA sequences for the purposes of sequencing and probing. It should have a broad range of applications, including the detection and identification of known pathogens that are difficult to culture. This approach may make it possible to identify new, nonculturable bacterial pathogens.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Saiki, R. K., Scharf, S., Faloona, F., Mullis, K. B., Horn, G. T., Erlich, H. A., & Arnheim, N. (1985) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.2999980 · Cited by 8,956
Cited by
Dunbar, J., Ticknor, L. O., & Kuske, C. R. (2001) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.67.1.190-197.2001 · Cited by 561
Jangid, K., Williams, M. A., Franzluebbers, A. J., Schmidt, T. M., Coleman, D. C., & Whitman, W. B. (2011) · Soil Biology and Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.soilbio.2011.06.022 · Cited by 482
Isolation of Rochalimaea Species from Cutaneous and Osseous Lesions of Bacillary Angiomatosis
Koehler, J. E., Quinn, F. D., Berger, T. G., LeBoit, P. E., & Tappero, J. W. (1992) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199212033272303 · Cited by 459
Kong, L.-C., Tap, J., Aron-Wisnewsky, J., Pelloux, V., Basdevant, A., Bouillot, J.-L., Zucker, J.-D., Doré, J., & Clément, K. (2013) · The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.3945/ajcn.113.058743 · Cited by 416
Dunbar, J., Ticknor, L. O., & Kuske, C. R. (2000) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.66.7.2943-2950.2000 · Cited by 420
Metadata
- Authors
- Wilson, K. H., Blitchington, R. B., & Greene, R. C.
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Microbiology
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 1990-09
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1942-1946
- ISSN
- 0095-1137 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-660X
- OpenAlex
- W1607650002
- Cited by
- 647
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 5.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Amplification of bacterial 16S ribosomal DNA with polymerase chain reaction. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/jcm.28.9.1942-1946.1990
- The paper
- Wilson, K. H., Blitchington, R. B., & Greene, R. C. (1990). Amplification of bacterial 16S ribosomal DNA with polymerase chain reaction. Journal of Clinical Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1128/jcm.28.9.1942-1946.1990
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.