The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Collaborative comparison of broth macrodilution and microdilution antifungal susceptibility tests
Open accessAbstract
A collaborative comparison of macro- and microdilution antifungal susceptibility tests was performed in five laboratories. MICs of amphotericin B, fluconazole, flucytosine, and ketoconazole were determined in all five centers against 95 coded isolates of Candida spp., Cryptococcus neoformans, and Torulopsis glabrata. A standard protocol with the following National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards Subcommittee on Antifungal Susceptibility Testing recommendations was used: an inoculum standardized by spectrophotometer, buffered (RPMI 1640) medium (pH 7.0), incubation at 35 degrees C, and an additive drug dilution procedure. Two inoculum sizes were tested (1 x 10(4) to 5 x 10(3) to 2.5 x 10(3) CFU/ml) and three scoring criteria were evaluated for MIC endpoint determinations, which were scored as 0 (optically clear), < or = 1 (slightly hazy turbidity), and < or = 2 (prominent decrease in turbidity compared with that of the growth control). Overall intra- and interlaboratory reproducibility was optimal with the low-density inoculum, the second-day readings, and MICs scored as either 1 or 2. The microdilution MICs demonstrated interlaboratory agreement with most of the four drugs higher than or similar to that of the macrodilution MICs. In general, there was good interlaboratory agreement with amphotericin B, fluconazole, and flucytosine; ketoconazole gave more variable results.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Hospital-Acquired Candidemia: The Attributable Mortality and Excess Length of Stay
Wey, S. B. (1988) · Archives of Internal Medicine · doi:10.1001/archinte.1988.00380120094019 · Cited by 831
Cited by
Cryptococcosis in the era of AIDS--100 years after the discovery of Cryptococcus neoformans
Mitchell, T. G., & Perfect, J. R. (1995) · Clinical Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1128/cmr.8.4.515 · Cited by 1,213
Current and emerging azole antifungal agents
Sheehan, D. J., Hitchcock, C. A., & Sibley, C. M. (1999) · Clinical Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1128/cmr.12.1.40 · Cited by 1,137
Rex, J. H., Pfaller, M. A., Galgiani, J. N., Bartlett, M. S., Espinel-Ingroff, A., Ghannoum, M. A., Lancaster, M., Odds, F. C., Rinaldi, M. G., Walsh, T. J., et al. (1997) · Clinical Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1093/clinids/24.2.235 · Cited by 855
Self-citationAntifungal Susceptibility Testing: Practical Aspects and Current Challenges
Rex, J. H., Pfaller, M. A., Walsh, T. J., Chaturvedi, V., Espinel-Ingroff, A., Ghannoum, M. A., Gosey, L. L., Odds, F. C., Rinaldi, M. G., Sheehan, D. J., et al. (2001) · Clinical Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1128/cmr.14.4.643-658.2001 · Cited by 444
Self-citationPerfect, J. R., & Casadevall, A. (2002) · Infectious Disease Clinics of North America · doi:10.1016/s0891-5520(02)00036-3 · Cited by 363
Metadata
- Authors
- Espinel-Ingroff, A., Kish, C. W., Kerkering, T. M., Fromtling, R. A., Bartizal, K., Galgiani, J. N., Villareal, K., Pfaller, M. A., Gerarden, T., & Rinaldi, M. G.
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Microbiology
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 1992-12
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 3138-3145
- ISSN
- 0095-1137 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-660X
- OpenAlex
- W2135770392
- Cited by
- 243
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 20.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Collaborative comparison of broth macrodilution and microdilution antifungal susceptibility tests. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/jcm.30.12.3138-3145.1992
- The paper
- Espinel-Ingroff, A., Kish, C. W., Kerkering, T. M., Fromtling, R. A., Bartizal, K., Galgiani, J. N., Villareal, K., Pfaller, M. A., Gerarden, T., & Rinaldi, M. G. (1992). Collaborative comparison of broth macrodilution and microdilution antifungal susceptibility tests. Journal of Clinical Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1128/jcm.30.12.3138-3145.1992
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.